stoiclime@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoIndia landed on the Moon for less than it cost to make Interstellar | The Independentwww.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up1355cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1355external-linkIndia landed on the Moon for less than it cost to make Interstellar | The Independentwww.independent.co.ukstoiclime@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square33fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareEddieTee77@lemdro.idlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·1 year agoAnd unlike Russia, they were successful
minus-squarepingveno@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up14·1 year agoRussia landed on the moon, too. They just had a few more pieces.
minus-squareiamak@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoYou could say Russian landing was more impactful and groundbreaking
minus-squareJohnDClay@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 year agoOn the second try. First time their engine also over preformed putting them out of the very narrow corridor that their altimeter was expecting. But it looks like India has really overhauled and reworked the code to be much more robust this time.
And unlike Russia, they were successful
India landed on the moon.
Russia landed on the moon, too. They just had a few more pieces.
Removed by mod
Any%
You could say Russian landing was more impactful and groundbreaking
Ba dum tiss
On the second try. First time their engine also over preformed putting them out of the very narrow corridor that their altimeter was expecting. But it looks like India has really overhauled and reworked the code to be much more robust this time.