fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 22 hours agocheck it before you wreck itmander.xyzimagemessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1775
arrow-up1775imagecheck it before you wreck itmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 22 hours agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squareAqarius@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 hours agoI agree. Except for the “this paper will be sad if you don’t read it” one, that one’s on point.
minus-squareSeptimaeus@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 hours agoI mean, we’re not talking about mutually exclusive properties. Whether a paper is more or less dry and whether it’s more or less accessible to newcomers is separate from the quality of the contribution. You can have both.
I agree.
Except for the “this paper will be sad if you don’t read it” one, that one’s on point.
I mean, we’re not talking about mutually exclusive properties.
Whether a paper is more or less dry and whether it’s more or less accessible to newcomers is separate from the quality of the contribution.
You can have both.