I have been self-hosting for a while now with Traefik. It works, but I’d like to give Nginx Proxy Manager a try, it seems easier to manage stuff not in docker.

Edit: btw I’m going to try this out on my RPI, not my hetzner vps, so no risk of breaking anything

    • mr_jaaay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Seconding Caddy. I’ve been using it for a couple of years now in an LXC and it’s been very easy to setup, edit and run.

  • Pax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 days ago

    Nginx from day one. Well documented, it works. If something doesn’t work chances are you are a quick googlefu away from the solution.

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Traefik is a PITA.

    Caddy all the way. If you build it with Docker support (or grab the prebuilt), you can use docker container names to reverse proxy using names instead of any IP addresses or ports. It’s nice because if the IP updates, so does caddy. All automatically.

    Here’s what my caddyfile looks like;

    {
            acme_dns cloudflare {key}
    }
    
    domain.dev {
            encode zstd gzip
            root * /var/www/html/domain.dev/
            php_fastcgi unix//run/php/php8.1-fpm.sock
            tls {
                    dns cloudflare {key}
            }
    }
    *.domain.dev {
            encode zstd gzip
            tls {
                    dns cloudflare {key}
            }
            @docker host docker.domain.dev
            handle @docker {
                    encode zstd gzip
                    reverse_proxy {portainer}
            }
            @test host test.domain.dev
            handle @test {
                    encode zstd gzip
                    reverse_proxy 127.0.0.1:10000
            }
            @images host i.domain.dev
            handle @images {
                    encode zstd gzip
                    reverse_proxy 127.0.0.1:9002
            }
            @proxy host proxy.domain.dev
            handle @proxy {
                    encode zstd gzip
                    reverse_proxy proxy
            }
            @portal host portal.domain.dev
            handle @portal {
                    encode zstd gzip
                    reverse_proxy portal
            }
            @ping host ping.domain.dev
            handle @ping {
                    encode zstd gzip
                    respond "pong!"
            }
    }
    

    DNS hosted by cloudflare but because caddy handles ACME certs, all the subdomains automatically get SSL.

    • Lena@gregtech.euOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Actually I found traefik rather easy, I just had to make the proper docker labels and config.

      PITA

      Unrelated, I’m going to sound like a grammar nazi here, but holy shit there are so many acronmys, how am I supposed to know every one of them without googling? Please just say “traefik is a pain in the ass”. Also please don’t take this as a snarky reply.

      • Xanza@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        PITA = pain in the ass.

        I never said it was hard. Just a real pain in the ass. Like iptables vs UFW. They’re the same thing, but one is easy and a pain in the ass and the other is just easy… So I opt to make my life easier. lol

  • mbirth@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 days ago

    it seems easier to manage stuff not in docker

    Read into Traefik’s dynamic configuration. Adding something outside of Docker is as easy as adding a new config file in the dynamic configuration folder. E.g. jellyfin.yml:

    http:
    
      routers:
    
        jellyfin:
          rule: Host(`jellyfin.example.org`)
          entrypoints: websecure
          tls:
            certResolver: le
          service: jellyfin
    
      services:
    
        jellyfin:
          loadbalancer:
            servers:
              - url: "http://192.168.1.5:8096/"
    

    The moment you save that file it will be active and working in Traefik.

  • Tenkard@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    Caddy. I started with npm but I realized it was hiding enough stuff that I wasn’t learning anything about managing networking. Caddy is super easy and has lot of sane defaults.

    • icmpecho@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      same, i’ve been very happy with Caddy, even with lots of subdomains and weird configs it’s been rock solid.

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    Stick with Traefik if you’ve figured it out. It’s much more powerful than NPM in my opinion. If you insist on using NPM, you might want to try NPMPlus, it has more bells and whistles and is more actively maintained.

  • traches@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’ve been using caddyserver for awhile and love it. Config is nicely readable and the defaults are very good.

  • midnight@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’ll throw in another recommendation for Caddy. I’ve been using it for years and the few problems/feature suggestions I had got implemented by the developers pretty quickly. They’re super active on their forums and I haven’t yet run into an issue where I couldn’t either figure it out myself or with help from their community forums (usually from a dev.) They’re very friendly and won’t berate you for simple mistakes like other devs.

  • sandwichsaregood@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I really like Zoraxy. Similar to NPM but it’s its own thing and I like it a lot more

    I know how to use raw nginx/Caddy/traefik to do it, but I find the WebUI and all the extra features Zoraxy has to be very convenient and easy to use.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    i use nginx proxy manager but im barely getting by. Theres zero useful documentation for setting up custom paths so everyone uses subdomains. I ended up buying my own domain just so i didnt feel guilty spamming freedns lmao.

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Caddy is the only reverse proxy I have ever managed to successfully make use of. I failed miserably with Nginix and Traefik.

    Caddy has worked very well for me for several years now. It gets the SSL certificate from my domain name provider and all.

  • Other@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    I am using nginx on a separate machine (VM) I have yet to try it in docker, I just have not found a reason to change it yet.

    I’ve tried npm, caddy and traefik but they are always way more complicated then adding a new config file in nginx…

    I feel the others add too much to the docker configs and limit what can be added to the reverse proxy. I have control of access from the nginx server, without having to change the apps configuration.

    NPM is the closest to what I would like (only needing the same network in docker) if I go the docker way but for some reason it never works as it should when I configure it. So I am sticking to plain nginx.

  • CrankyCarrot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I use Traefik at home. The initial setup was more complex than others but now it’s set up it’s by far the easiest to add new routes than any other I’ve tried, just by virtue of being right there in the compose/k8s files I’m already writing. Static routes are manual of course, but so are every other proxy so that’s no different, and they’re not exactly complicated (I see another comment has examples). The config files are the same markup language as your Compose/k8s files so you’re not learning a whole new syntax and having to switch languages mentally as you switch between them.

    Caddy is super easy, but the fact that the Docker labels thing was a plugin is a con to me, I’d prefer it being first party. It also isn’t as performant as Traefik, higher CPU usage while also having higher latency.

    As far as I’m aware, Nginx and Nginx Proxy Manager support no such thing, you have to manually write those routes every time you create a new service. Personally I think Nginxs config syntax annoying, I’m very comfortable with it now but I much prefer TOML/YAML.

    Nginx Proxy Manager is a lot like Portainer. It’s useful for people who don’t want to learn Nginx and/or just want to click a few buttons. But anything complex you’re suddenly going to be thrown into the deep end.

    You’ve already set up Traefik, you’ve already done the complex bit. IMO there’s no reason to change, from this point everything else is more complicated.

    We use Nginx at work but are currently in the process of switching to Traefik.

  • MXX53@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    I use traefik. I like it. Took a bit to understand, but it has some cool options like ssl passthrough and middlewares for basic auth.

    • mbirth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      You can even use it to do the SSL part for a local non-SSL IMAP server. And, there’s a CrowdSec middleware as well, that will block blacklisted IPs.