Japan started releasing treated radioactive water from the wrecked Fukushima nuclear power plant into the Pacific Ocean on Thursday, a polarising move that prompted China to announce an immediate blanket ban on all aquatic products from Japan.

China is “highly concerned about the risk of radioactive contamination brought by… Japan’s food and agricultural products,” the customs bureau said in a statement.

The Japanese government signed off on the plan two years ago and it was given a green light by the U.N. nuclear watchdog last month. The discharge is a key step in decommissioning the Fukushima Daiichi plant after it was destroyed by a tsunami in 2011.

  • Vecto@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    168
    ·
    1 year ago

    The water is less radioactive than humans, the ban is purely political and in no way safety related

    • zephyreks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fish accumulate toxins and heavy metals as you move up the food chain. This is well-known.

      Even though swordfish swim in waters that have perfectly safe mercury concentrations, eating swordfish everyday is inadvisable because of their high mercury contents.

      • Kangie@lemmy.srcfiles.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a great point, however it ignores just one inconvenient fact:

        Tritiated water cannot bio-accumulate in the environment

        Source: “Current understanding of organically bound tritium (OBT) in the environment” S.B. Kim, N. Baglan, P.A. Davis

            • zephyreks@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              But he does think that non-tritium contaminates missed by the ALPS system could build up over time near the shore.

              “Nearshore in Japan could be affected in the long term because of accumulation of non-tritium forms of radioactivity,” he says. That could ultimately hurt fisheries in the area.

              US psyops trying to gaslight people again?

              • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                1 year ago

                The radioactive content of the released water is lower than that of seawater. How is it going to build up

                • zephyreks@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Ah yes, because the only danger of nuclear meltdown industrial wastewater is tritium.

                  One big concern is that the ALPS system is imperfect: it supposedly removes other radioactive contaminants to within legal limits, but those legal limits ARE higher than that of seawater. The ALPS has also been custom-designed for this project: it is a bespoke system that hasn’t been tested in production.

                  Plus, this is coming from the same private entity that mismanaged the Fukushima plant enough to cause the disaster… How much faith do you have in them to not fuck up again? Tepco’s optimizing for their bottom line, not for what’s best for society.

                  • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Everything is imperfect. The ocean contains 4.5 billion tons of uranium and that only contributes a small fraction of the natural radioactivity of the ocean. This is not a public health concern and insisting on some stupid demand for perfection when the water you’re exhausting is less radioactive than the water you’re putting it into is fucking idiocy

            • zephyreks@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              US psyops trying to gaslight the content of the article. There are trace elements of other contaminants… Of unknown concentration, and we have to take TEPCO’s word that it’s “like, totally safe man, just like our nuclear reactors”

              • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                There’s 4.5 billion tons of uranium dissolved in the ocean, I’m pretty sure a couple milligrams of trace elements isn’t going to change anything.

                • zephyreks@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Oh, because that’s a great answer to a localized ban.

                  Guess what? Most of the volume of the ocean isn’t chilling in Japanese territorial waters.

                  • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago
                    1. currents exist

                    2. even without currents mixing the water, diluting trace elements into the fucking ocean is fine

          • Treczoks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 year ago

            I recommend reading the article again. They got anything but the tritium out of the water. Which is comparable easy to accomplish, and also important. The remaining tritium is as harmless as radioactive things can get in the first place.

            A radiation scientist here reminded people of those radium-based glow-in-the-dark wrist watches, and compared the radiation caused by this wastewater release to adding about 70 to 80 of those watches to the pacific ocean.