Faced with relentless Republican attacks on reproductive freedom including efforts to give embryos and fetuses legal rights from the moment of conception, Democratic lawmakers in two states have recently introduced legislation that would ban men from ejaculating for purposes other than making babies, with some exceptions.

  • knightmare1147@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    19 hours ago

    What does this serve other than performative at best and worryingly close to mimicking the actual bigoted actions that are taking place right now? Please, I need to see some outreach to communities that are hurting, not ‘gotcha’ moments that do nothing but circle the drain.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      16 hours ago

      performative at best and worryingly close to mimicking the actual bigoted actions that are taking place

      You just summed up everything the Dem leadership ever does to #Resist 😮‍💨

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Sometimes you need a “gotcha” moment to make headlines and hopefully reacha few people who are so delusional they think prohibiting abortion is in any way related to saving lives.

      They can donthe outreach to, it just doesn’t garner media attention. That’s not to say they’re doing it. They are Democrats, after all. Ineffective and performative are on-brand.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      this is literally outreach to those communities by applying the same absurd standards that are being applied to the current victims to the oppressors.

      This is a valid and effective proposal to counter the reproductive rights recently stolen from women.

      • shikitohno@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Nah, this is performative nonsense to grab some headlines and say, “See, we’re doing stuff,” that doesn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell of actually passing and changing peoples’ lives. Meanwhile, the Republicans are running roughshod all over the Democrats on things that actually have pretty immediate, overwhelmingly negative impacts on peoples’ lives, like the shitshow that is DOGE, and the Democrats are just angrily wagging their collective finger and going, “Why, Mr. President, if you don’t knock that off, I’m going to really get cross with you. I daresay, I may even use uncouth language in reference to your person, despite the esteemed office you occupy!” They aren’t even making token efforts at trying to derail any of his cabinet picks and get some GOP defectors to help block them.

        They’ve tried nothing and thrown up their hands, so now it’s time to draw out the tried and true playbook of looking as incompetent and out of touch at a key moment in history as they can possibly manage to do, short of outright switching party membership and taking up the GOP mantle themselves.

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          restricting people’s bodily autonomy and healthcare so that they are dying in the streets of the US is not “performative nonsense”.

          there was US legislation passed by extremists that restricts civil liberties and takes away the rights of women in the United States, and women are dying and becoming extremely ill as a result.

          If women’s rights are restricted in that country, then so should be the men’s.

          • shikitohno@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            restricting people’s bodily autonomy and healthcare so that they are dying in the streets of the US is not “performative nonsense”.

            That’s not what I said, and you know it. Republicans implemented a concrete policy, with dire real world consequences. These proposed bills are dead before they’ve even finished drafting them, and accomplish nothing beyond creating a moment of tone-deaf political theater so that people who already agree with them can pat themselves on the back.

            This does nothing to undo the harms of Republican anti-abortion laws, it doesn’t prevent any of those women from dying, it’s performative bullshit preaching to the choir. This isn’t going to make Republicans suddenly go, “Gee, I never thought of it like that,” it’s just to get brownie points in liberal circles.

            They could have, I don’t know, removed the filibuster and expand the Supreme Court to prevent Republicans from doing exactly what they said they wanted to do the last time around, but that’s a step too far for the Democrats. I mean, it could have put the matter to rest definitively enough until they had a legislative majority that would let them codify abortion rights, but heavens forbid they kill off one of their great fundraising cash cows and lose the ability to campaign on “If you don’t vote Democrat, the Republicans are going to undo Roe v. Wade!” This is another blunder like Hillary’s pied piper strategy that came back to bite them when Republicans did the thing Democrats thought couldn’t seriously happen.

            If women’s rights are restricted in that country, then so should be the men’s.

            Two wrongs don’t make a right, and even if they did, you and I both know these bills have a 0% chance of actually passing and changing anything.

            This is a valid and effective proposal to counter the reproductive rights recently stolen from women.

            Since you’re so sure this isn’t purely performative, but a valid and effective counter, would you care to quantify that efficacy for me? How many of these bills need to be proposed and die before they even hit the floor to win over enough Republicans? How many until women who lost their reproductive rights actually see them restored? Until women stop dying from being denied basic healthcare? I’m not expecting an exact number, but surely, you could give me a ballpark estimate and a timeline for these efforts to start producing results, as confident as you are in this strategy.

            • Varyk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              32 minutes ago

              “That’s not what I said”

              That’s literally what you said, that restricting bodily autonomy through legislation was a performance piece.

              If the religious extremists are going to restrict women’s civil rights and bodily autonomy, the rational lawmakers should also be restricting men’s civil rights and bodily autonomy.

              this is a very practical solution.

              “Two wrongs don’t make a right”

              that isn’t what’s happening.

              they are fighting fire with fire.

              they are backburning to stop the wildfire destroying civil rights because of religious extremists and oligarchs that have been elected or appointed.

              “Since you’re so sure this isn’t purely performative”

              it isn’t. this legislation prohibiting female bodily autonomy already happened.

              raped children are being forced to keep their rape babies.

              women are dying in the parking. lots of hospitals.

              they are being bounty hunted for seeking medical care.

              That’s not performative. those are real life effects of these people. you want to allow to steal civil rights, including basic human dignity.

              shame on you.

    • anon6789@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I’m with you on this stuff. Leave this stuff to The Daily Show correspondents. This is as serious as the Red, White, and Blue Land proposal.

      If I’m looking for who I’m voting for and saw:

      1. Tried but failed to get school breakfast refunded.

      2. Tried to troll Republicans with the Ant-Whacking bill.

      Number 1 may have also failed to accomplish anything, but they spent their time in office at least attempting to do what they were elected to do.

      This stuff feels like lame Ron/Rand Paul crap trying to make worthless votes look like they’re actually principles. If this is the best use of time they can find, we’re in trouble. They need to be out figuring out why they lost to literal criminals, not coming up with ways to “slam” them and doing their version of Steven Miller’s searching out obscure old regulation to impede the burning of our rights and protections.