Background: 15 years of experience in software and apparently spoiled because it was already set up correctly.

Been practicing doing my own servers, published a test site and 24 hours later, root was compromised.

Rolled back to the backup before I made it public and now I have a security checklist.

  • Tablaste@linux.communityOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    I published it to the internet and the next day, I couldn’t ssh into the server anymore with my user account and something was off.

    Tried root + password, also failed.

    Immediately facepalmed because the password was the generic 8 characters and there was no fail2ban to stop guessing.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      94
      ·
      22 days ago

      Don’t use passwords for ssh. Use keys and disable password authentication.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        ·
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        More importantly, don’t open up SSH to public access. Use a VPN connection to the server. This is really easy to do with Netbird, Tailscale, etc. You should only ever be able to connect to SSH privately, never over the public net.

        • troed@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          22 days ago

          It’s perfectly safe to run SSH on port 22 towards the open Internet with public key authentication only.

              • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                21 days ago

                A VPN like Wireguard can run over UDP on a random port which is nearly impossible to discover for an attacker. Unlike sshd, it won’t even show up in a portscan.

                This was a specific design goal of Wireguard by the way (see “5.1 Silence is a virtue” here https://www.wireguard.com/papers/wireguard.pdf)

                It also acts as a catch-all for all your services, so instead of worrying about the security of all the different sshds or other services you may have exposed, you just have to keep your vpn up to date.

                • troed@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  21 days ago

                  Yeah I don’t do security via obscurity :D I agree you need to keep your Internet facing services up to date.

                  (No need to educate me on Wireguard, I use it. My day job is slightly relevant to the discussion)

                  • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    21 days ago

                    Yeah I don’t do security via obscurity

                    Another one who misunderstands that phrase… Yes, obscurity shouldn’t be your only line of defense, but limiting discoverability of your systems should be an integral part of your security strategy.

              • designatedhacker@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                21 days ago

                Are you talking a VPN running on the same box as the service? UDP VPN would help as another mentioned, but doesn’t really add isolation.

                If your vpn box is standalone, then getting root is bad but just step one. They have to own the VPN to be able to even do more recon then try SSH.

                Defense in depth. They didn’t immediately get server root and application access in one step. Now they have to connect to a patched, cert only, etc SSH server. Just looking for it could trip into some honeypot. They had to find the VPN host as well which wasn’t the same as the box they were targeting. That would shut down 99% of the automated/script kiddie shit finding the main service then scanning that IP.

                You can’t argue that one step to own the system is more secure than two separate pieces of updated software on separate boxes.

        • josefo@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          21 days ago

          Tailscale? Netbird? I have been using hamachi like a fucking neanderthal. I love this posts, I learn so much

          • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            22 days ago

            we’re probably talking about different things. virtually no distribution comes with root access with a password. you have to explicitly give the root user a password. without a password no amount of brute force sshing root will work. I’m not saying the root user is entirely disabled. so either the service OP is building on is basically a goldmine for compromised machines or OP literally shot themselves in the root by giving root a password manually. something you should never do.

            • satans_methpipe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              20 days ago

              Yeah I was confused about the comment chain. I was thinking terminal login vs ssh. You’re right in my experience…root ssh requires user intervention for RHEL and friends and arch and debian.

              Side note: did you mean to say “shot themselves in the root”? I love it either way.

              • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                20 days ago

                Side note: did you mean to say “shot themselves in the root”? I love it either way.

                ssh its better with the typo. ;)

            • steventhedev@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 days ago

              Many cloud providers (the cheap ones in particular) will put patches on top of the base distro, so sometimes root always gets a password. Even for Ubuntu.

              There are ways around this, like proper cloud-init support, but not exactly beginner friendly.

      • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        22 days ago

        Love Hetzner. You just give them your public key and they boot you into a rescue system from which you can install what you want how you want.

        • r00ty@kbin.life
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          22 days ago

          I think their auction servers are a hidden gem. I mean the prices used to be better. Now they have some kind of systrem that resets them when they get too low. But the prices are still pretty good I think. But a year or two ago I got a pretty good deal on two decently spec’d servers.

          People are scared off by the fact you just get their rescue prompt on auctions boxes… Except their rescue prompt has a guided imaging setup tool to install pretty much every popular distro with configurable raid options etc.

          • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            22 days ago

            Yeah, I basically jump from auction system to auction system every other year or so and either get a cheaper or more powerful server or both.

            • r00ty@kbin.life
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              22 days ago

              I monitor for good deals. Because there’s no contract it’s easy to add one, move stuff over at your leisure and kill the old one off. It’s the better way to do it for semi serious stuff.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      because the password was the generic 8 characters and there was no fail2ban to stop guessing

      Oof yea that’ll do it, your usually fine as long as you hardened enough to at least ward off the script kiddies. The people with actual real skill tend to go after…juicer targets lmao

      • Tablaste@linux.communityOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        22 days ago

        Haha I’m pretty sure my little server was just part of the “let’s test our dumb script to see if it works. Oh wow it did what a moron!”

        Lessons learned.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 days ago

      Lol ssh has no reason to be port exposed in 99% of home server setups.

      VPNs are extremely easy, free, and wireguard is very performant with openvpn also fine for ssh. I have yet to see any usecase for simply port forwarding ssh in a home setup. Even a public git server can be tunneled through https.