fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com to The Democratic People's™ Republic of Tankiejerk@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoOutjerked yet againlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up139file-textcross-posted to: meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up139imageOutjerked yet againlemmy.dbzer0.comfxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com to The Democratic People's™ Republic of Tankiejerk@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square13fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works
minus-squarejaxxed@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 days agoI would consider a communist identity if it weren’t for the major examples of communism in application and how poorly people were treated. Can I consider communism but reject Stalinism and Maoism?
minus-squarefxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 days agoThose were not communism, not even socialism. Just state capitalism. Yes, you can consider communism without either of those joke ideologies.
minus-squarejaxxed@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoWho should I read after Marx/Angels. Anyth8ng newer?
I would consider a communist identity if it weren’t for the major examples of communism in application and how poorly people were treated. Can I consider communism but reject Stalinism and Maoism?
Those were not communism, not even socialism. Just state capitalism. Yes, you can consider communism without either of those joke ideologies.
Who should I read after Marx/Angels. Anyth8ng newer?