I have problems with people who abstained. The hard thing is, how do you change voter behavior?

  • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Cite a proven example of pro-Palestine manipulation, and we can discuss it. Otherwise, no.

    Both examples you provided are trivial as they don’t interface with literal apartheid or genocide. This is a significant difference being overlooked, and without evidence, I have no reason to believe this conspiracy.

    • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      New “Leopards Ate My Face” dropped. In this fun twist, however, after seeing the Leopards Eating Faces party feed people’s faces to leopards multiple times, the user continues to give the party the benefit of the doubt when confronted with the likelyhood that it’s happening again.

      • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        12 hours ago

        So no example, got it. It’s fine for you to engage in fearmongering and unevidenced cynicism. I choose not to. My regards. Free Palestine.

        • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          There’s a big difference between being realistic and fearmongering. For instance, if there was no history of domestic and foreign entities utilizing astroturfing to undermine democracy and people were saying it’s happening now, that’s fearmongering. Considering that there is, however, and that it seemed to work last time, it’s naive to assume that it wouldn’t happen again, especially when similar patterns of behavior emerge, including the presence of a new hot-button topic that can be utilized. That’s realism.