Summary

Progressive Democrats accused Donald Trump and Elon Musk of orchestrating a “constitutional crisis” after Musk moved to shut down USAID and gained access to a federal payment system.

Lawmakers, blocked from entering USAID’s headquarters, condemned Trump for granting Musk unchecked power over government functions.

Senator Elizabeth Warren warned that Musk’s involvement could trigger financial instability, while Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called it a “plutocratic coup.”

  • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The democrats are refusing to employ any of the government-breaking strategies the republicans just proved, over years as a minority party, can bring the government to crawl. Worse than that, they are enabling everything the republicans are doing. They aren’t even putting up a fight. They’d rather be “civil” and “the adults in the room” than actually stop fascism. They are controlled opposition.

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I get the first picture but the second? We know democrats do not vote lockstep and we have pretty traitorous members like fettermen are among them. I see 37 voting correctly. This is one thing about when they are in power. People expect them to vote in lockstep like the republicans but that has never been the case.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I get the first picture but the second? We know democrats do not vote lockstep

        They expect democratic voters to.

      • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        So, you’re essentially saying this is normal for democrats? It’s normal for them to go to bat for republicans? How is that a defense?

        It never ceases to amaze me how hard people go in making excuses for democrats.

        • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          no its more that some democrats are not very much of ones. usually in swing states. I actually agree they should not vote for canidates based on electability but that is a problem with the electorate of the state with the primaries. But yeah democratic canidates in red states can be very conservative but repbulican canidates in blue states will still be very conservative. which is why you don’t want to be voting for them at any level no matter what bs they spew because they will always toe the line which has mostly meant get rid of regulations and lower taxes on the wealthy.

          • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 hours ago

            That’s just a No True Scotsman. “The subset of democrats who vote in line with Republicans, thus making all other democrats’ resistance moot, are simply not real democrats”

            • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Not really. Its the reality of a republic. I can’t vote for democrats outside of the ones who represent me. I am good with their voting records. I cannot effect who gets voted into other states but I can see the history. I am also good with the democratic presidential canidates like biden over trump or kamala over trump. so I vote that way with them. I would encourage people in other states to vote for better democratic canidates as better repbulican ones will 100% vote lockstep with the party no matter what they say while the democrat may do what they said they would. I honestly don’t know what those democrats campaigned on.