Since 2016, I’ve had a fileserver mostly just for backups. System is on 1 drive, RAID6 for files, and semi-annual cold backup.

I was playing with Photoprism, and their docs say “we recommend placing the storage folder on a local SSD drive for best performance.” In this case, the storage folder holds basically everything but the pictures themselves such as the database files.

Up until now, if I lost any database files, it was just a matter of rebuilding them by re-indexing my photos or whatever, but I’m looking for something more robust since I’ll have some friends/family using Pixelfed, Matrix, etc.

So my question is: Is it a valid strategy to keep database files on the SSD with some kind of nightly backup to RAID, or should I just store the whole lot on the RAID from the get go? Or does it even matter if all of these databases can fit in RAM anyway?

edit: I’m just now learning of ZFS caching which might be my answer.

  • MangoPenguin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Both your RAID and NVMe data should be getting backed up daily to 2 different destinations, if it’s irreplaceable.

    But to answer your question, just place the DB and cache files for Photoprism on the NVMe, and the photos themselves on the RAID.

    • ch00f@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Can you suggest a method for two-destination daily backups that don’t involve a 3rd party service? At the moment, I’m doing every six months or so on two sets of cold storage, one offsite.

      • MangoPenguin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        That sounds reasonable, although I’d be worried about not having an extra local daily backup in case files get corrupted or accidentally deleted.