• Sabre363@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    None of this has anything to do with the model being open source or not, plenty of other people have already disputed that claim.

    • Grapho@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s a model that outperforms the other ones in a bunch of areas with a smaller footprint and which was trained for less than a twentieth of the price, and then it was released as open source.

      If it were European or US made nobody would deem it suspicious if somebody talked about it all month, but it’s a Chinese breakthrough and god forbid you talk about it for three days

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      It has everything to do with the tech being open. You can dispute it all you like, but the fact is that all the code and research behind it is open. Anybody could build a new model from scratch using open data if they wanted to. That’s what matters.

      • Sabre363@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        I’m commenting on the odd nature of the post and your behavior in the comments, pointing out that it comes across as more a shallow advertisement than a sincere endorsement, that is all. I don’t know enough about DeepSeek to discuss it meaningfully, nor do I have enough evidence to decide upon its open source status.