• LandedGentry@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    26% down from a wildly inflated peak isn’t all that earth shattering tbh.

    However the growth in popularity and price drop with synthetic diamonds - that’s what’s newsworthy here.

  • a9cx34udP4ZZ0@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 days ago

    Bottom falls out on commodity made artifically rare through imperailism and corruption. Is this the part where I’m supposed to feel bad for De Beers?

    • sunbytes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      The free market manages to solve a problem.

      I wonder how much money it’s going to cost the diamond lobby to un-solve it.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      To be fair, diamonds are indeed rare on earth. But what made diamond price come crashing is because we now managed to synthesise the diamonds. These “fake” diamonds flooded the market. This is good news so that we don’t have to rely on exploitative extraction of the mineral.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        They’re not especially rare, not even gem-quality ones. For several generations, almost every married woman in a western country had a diamond on her finger of some size. They found plenty of them to serve that market. The mines created artificial scarcity by colluding together.

        If lab grown had never happened, diamond mines might not have been able to serve industrial customers. Industrial customers don’t care how it looks as long as it cuts, and so lab grown has been good enough for decades. Thus, you can get a two-pack 4.5 inch diamond angle grinder wheel at Home Depot for around twenty bucks.

      • TurtleSoup@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        Also because newer generations just aren’t sold on diamonds being a luxury item anymore. Your average Joe just isn’t paying their rent or more on a diamond engagement/wedding ring like they used to because, well, that’s their rent payment or mortgage for something that’s gonna lose value the second they walk out of the store.

  • knexcar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    3 days ago

    Thank goodness, maybe I’ll finally be able to buy a diamond pickaxe for what few emeralds I have. I’ve been having to use stone tools in this economy and I’d really like some obsidian for a nether portal.

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    i never understood why a mined diamond has a bigger value than an artificially made one when the only difference is the suffering of the workers. ppl who like diamonds are stupid.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The first thing DeBeers tried was “artificial diamonds have imperfections, you want a real rock that’s selected to be as perfect as possible”. Then the artificial industry made diamonds so good that you could only tell the difference from the lack of imperfections. Then DeBeers marketing changed to “it’s too perfect, you want something that has the small imperfections of a natural process”.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      There is this idea that seems to be really pervasive that natural is always better. And it’s not true so often. A common example I like to give is that natural almond extract contains cyanide and artificial almond extract does not. No, it isn’t enough cyanide to kill you, but I would say no cyanide is better than some cyanide.

      And a lot of those “natural is always better” people would happily take fentanyl over willow bark if they were in agony.

    • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Same reason diamonds are valued in the first place. Marketing campaigns tricking the gullible majority and most of the rest conforming to not stand out and cause issues for themselves.

      • SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Diamonds do make sense as gemstones because of their hardness. They’ll stay scratch free for life. But ya, the diamond industry is garbage.

        • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Maybe, but realistically, most jewelry will have them inlaid in gold anyway, which is not hard at all. So you need to take care not to scratch it regardless of what gem is used.

          Also, many other gems are harder then steel which is about the hardest thing your jewelry would come into contact with.

          So I would say the benefit is minor.

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          They’re too common to be truly valuable, though, and that’s before factoring in that you can just make them now.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      For a long time (and maybe still currently I don’t know) they weren’t able to make diamonds bigger like people want. So for a small diamond it might not make any sense, but there was a point where ones we made weren’t meeting what people wanted.

      • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        synthetic diamond sizes keep getting bigger, but it is much harder to make them I think

        As of 2023 the heaviest synthetic diamond ever made weighs 30.18 ct (6.0 g); the heaviest natural diamond ever found weighs 3167 ct (633.4 g). Wikipedia

        That would be 1.7 vs 181 cm3

  • Loce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 days ago

    You know, it must be that food and rent are a bit higher priority than the pressure stones… especially when more and more people cant afford those… food and rent i mean.

    • TehWorld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      3 days ago

      I disagree. They ARE pretty. Just not as pretty as a rose or a sunset and yeah best used as industrial tooling.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        3 days ago

        I would rate them above roses personally. Below a good sunset though; nearly nothing manmade beats those

        • froh42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          Good sunsets are frequently man-made too, the most beautiful red glowing ones own their look to dust - air pollution.

        • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes, but you can’t take a good sunset and put it somewhere where you can look at it whenever. Pictures don’t really convey the full experience.

        • TehWorld@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Pedantry because funny: Diamonds and Roses aren’t man made either. On a more serious note, some things aren’t beautiful because they last but because they are fleeting.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Any rose you buy at a florist or other store is the product of centuries of selective breeding by horticulturists. So they are, in that sense, man-made. And now they’re getting into genetic modification.

            In fact, if you bought someone a dozen wild roses, they might be disappointed.

            Really, virtually anything plant-related you can buy in a store is a human creation at least in part. We don’t think of flowers we tend to grow and buy as domesticated, but they are.

          • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Lots of diamonds are man made, and most people can’t tell them apart from natural diamonds, especially without a microscope.

            • TehWorld@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              True. My wife specifically requested a Moissanite. Most engagement rings are (sadly) still natural diamond.

          • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Diamonds and Roses aren’t man made either.

            Yeah, but have you seen an unprocessed diamond? They don’t look all that interesting, especially when compared with other natural crystals. It certainly isn’t what most people think of when they picture a diamond.

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      The same can be said for precious metals as well except precious metals can’t be manufactured. Their natural scarcity gives them some value beyond their utility.

      Diamonds however are not scarce.