Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 个月前LDACsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square108fedilinkarrow-up1811
arrow-up1811imageLDACsh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 个月前message-square108fedilink
minus-squareKairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up40·1 个月前Bluetooth as a whole is kind of a mess if we’re being honest.
minus-squarecmnybo@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·1 个月前That’s what happens when you have a 25 year old protocol and try to maintain backwards compatibility through all of the versions.
minus-squaretabularasa@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 个月前Can we name a more poorly implemented protocol? Probably. One used as much as Bluetooth? Probably not.
minus-squareOnomatopoeia@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 个月前Comes from being a compromise “standard”. The name says it all, being named after a king that brought multiple tribes together.
Bluetooth as a whole is kind of a mess if we’re being honest.
That’s what happens when you have a 25 year old protocol and try to maintain backwards compatibility through all of the versions.
Can we name a more poorly implemented protocol? Probably. One used as much as Bluetooth? Probably not.
SMTP?
NAT
Comes from being a compromise “standard”. The name says it all, being named after a king that brought multiple tribes together.