Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 个月前LDACsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square111fedilinkarrow-up1814
arrow-up1814imageLDACsh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 3 个月前message-square111fedilink
minus-squarezod000@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·3 个月前AFAIK, ALAC will not be actually lossless over bluetooth for the sames reason LDAC can’t be lossless; there simply isn’t enough bandwidth. That doesn’t mean that it won’t sound great or perhaps work better than LDAC.
minus-squareKoalaUnknown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 个月前It runs over a 5GHz connection, not a 2.4GHz connection like bluetooth.
minus-squarezod000@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·3 个月前Oh, so they aren’t on bluetooth at all? That is an entirely different story, thanks for the info.
minus-squareGhoelian@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·3 个月前Wait what? Do they not connect over bluetooth? Please don’t tell me they made up more proprietary bullshit.
minus-squareKoalaUnknown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 个月前Yes, the protocol used is currently proprietary. That being said, so was ALAC at launch and they later made it open-sourced and royalty free.
AFAIK, ALAC will not be actually lossless over bluetooth for the sames reason LDAC can’t be lossless; there simply isn’t enough bandwidth. That doesn’t mean that it won’t sound great or perhaps work better than LDAC.
It runs over a 5GHz connection, not a 2.4GHz connection like bluetooth.
Oh, so they aren’t on bluetooth at all? That is an entirely different story, thanks for the info.
Wait what? Do they not connect over bluetooth? Please don’t tell me they made up more proprietary bullshit.
Yes, the protocol used is currently proprietary. That being said, so was ALAC at launch and they later made it open-sourced and royalty free.