• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Democrats kept the filibuster around for this reason, right? They didn’t just keep it around to prevent progressive policy from passing, right?

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The second they try to use it, the republicans will nuke it, citing the precedent that the democrats did it first with lower court judicial nominees when they refused to let a single one pass, same way they did with scotus nominees when democrats dared to use it one time in protest against the stunt they pulled with Garland.

        Force Dems to reign in minority power the tiniest bit and use that as an excuse to remove minority powers entirely the second they’re in the majority is pretty standard Rep SOP now.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Then the only point in preserving the filibuster was to block progressive legislation.

          At least Democrats didn’t have to codify Roe or pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Act.

          • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Trust me, I’m in agreement with you there. They really need to get their heads out of their asses and stop acting like the GOP fascists are going to follow the rules and act with integrity.

            And I’m being awfully generous here with assuming there’s a chance it isn’t malicious on their part, that maybe they really are just that incompetent to have missed the reality of this situation. Even though I don’t have much hope of that anymore.