The study, which is the first of its kind, evaluates the historical knowledge of leading AI models such as ChatGPT-4, Llama, and Gemini.

LLMs performed best on questions related to legal systems and social complexity, but they struggled significantly with topics such as discrimination and social mobility.

“The main takeaway from this study is that LLMs, while impressive, still lack the depth of understanding required for advanced history,” said del Rio-Chanona. “They’re great for basic facts, but when it comes to more nuanced, PhD-level historical inquiry, they’re not yet up to the task.”

Among the tested models, GPT-4 Turbo ranked highest with 46% accuracy, while Llama-3.1-8B scored the lowest at 33.6%.

  • NaiaEnglish
    2·
    2 days ago

    Most people don’t understand history. Anything trained on that is goanna struggle too.

    • ripripripriprip@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      2 days ago

      Humans and LLMs learn in fundamentally different ways, though.

      The nuance bit is really interesting, since I feel that nuance arises from these fundamental differences.