• sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I disagree that this is a “problem”. Votes are opinions, not objective fact.

          So what is the desired end result of a voting system, to promote popular opinions, or to promote interesting opinions? Because as implemented, voting-based SM tends to promote the former, and I think many people prefer the latter.

          So to me, it is a problem because it’s not meeting the goals that presumably most people have.

          With the downvotes, you have an immediate indication of a divisive position, ripe for a lively debate.

          Many platforms, like Reddit, hide comments that get too many downvotes. So many people just won’t see the interesting, controversial discussion, and I think that’s a problem.

          We should be sorting based on likeliness of being interesting, not popularity.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It only really works in smaller communities imo, as the community gets larger, it just reflects what’s popular, and that’s a separate scale from good vs bad, especially once your community has self-selected itself into a common way of thinking.

              So the question is, how do we mitigate that self selection? How do we promote diversity? Voting doesn’t seem to cut it, and I don’t think moderation is the way either (we just need the “right people” argument). So yeah, I’d like to see a lot more experimentation with different ways of sorting comments and posts, because I think promoting diverse content is better long term.