• HaiZhung@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 minutes ago

    I get the sentiment, who doesn’t want to dunk on Google?

    But the headline is needlessly inflammatory. There is no law yet; and google essentially is saying please please don’t implement it, it totally doesn’t make sense.

    Don’t get me wrong, the EU should still implement it. And once it is law; Google will also comply.

  • MaxPow3r11@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Damn.

    Wish the rest of us could just ignore all laws & not face any consequences.

    What a fucking joke this entire system is.

    • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They don’t have a problem giving someone 100 years for a quarter bag of weed though. For a first time offense.

  • HertzDentalBar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Sovereign citizens are really getting out of hand. Oh wait it’s google.

  • timestatic@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Fine the heck out of them then. If they don’t pay the fine ban em. Plenty of alternatives out there. More competition in the search engine market would be better anyways.

    Not too big of a fan of banning companies as the hurdles should be decently high… Especially if many people rely on their service but if they won’t comply with our jurisdiction long term I see this as the only option as fees can not be order of business to pay

  • DukeHawthorne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I want to live in a world where the EU bans Google, but we all know the EU will just roll over and accept this.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Didn’t a year ago or so, Some European lawmaker made a vague hint in support of something that involved regulations on social media, and Elon replied “go fuck yourself” verbatem?

    Play hardball, or surrender and give them what they want. there’s no compromise or middle ground with these techbro fascists

  • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    This is definitely to avoid the ire of fuhrer trump. It’s also coincidence that meta is abandoning fact checking right before the new administration

    He will sic the dogs of regulation on them if they don’t dance to his tune

  • xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Given that we are going full authoritarian fascist now, perhaps the EU should ban Google, given the US tik tok precedent.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 hours ago

      What a twist. In the 90s, the internet forced countries to wake up to the new modern era. It was a combination of American companies wanting both to expand and provide goodwill.

      And now, this new era is going to tell American companies to fuck off.

      • Toribor@corndog.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Democracies around the world rightly shouldn’t tolerate the blatant corruption and manipulative business practice of American tech companies.

        • ne0n@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          35 minutes ago

          America itself seems fine with it.

          Oh wait, you said Democracies right. My bad.

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 hours ago

    wish the eu would just actually ban american companies there is really no need for them anyway

  • rob200@endlesstalk.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Can’t believe Google’s doing this, they seemed to be the most dedicated to this of the big companies. Especially on Youtube.

  • Foni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    215
    ·
    14 hours ago

    In other words, a company, acting on behalf of its own shareholders, tells a government, which represents 100% of the citizens in a given territory, to shove its legislation where the sun doesn’t shine. And not only is this not inherently absurd, but it also stands a significant chance of succeeding in getting the government to comply.

      • yggstyle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        39
        ·
        11 hours ago

        They probably wouldn’t have had to if the school system hadn’t dropped language arts from most curriculums ages ago. Students now are getting a markedly shitter education and don’t even know they’re being fucked over.

        • Letme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It’s by design, the politicians only need 28% to win, easier to scrape those votes off the bottom of the barrel of knowledge

          • yggstyle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 hours ago

            What really stings is watching groups and communities which historically have been supportive of each other getting fragmented by overt social media operations. It’s asinine and just makes it easier to marginalize and oppress the people that most frequently need a voice.

            • Letme@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Our country is now run by Twitter and Truth Social, and too many people are already lost to social media disinformation campaigns (counter-intelligence)

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Feel like that speech would have meant more when he still had the power to do anything about it. Instead of going to war against this oligarchy he chose to cash his political capital on a rushed pull out of Afghanistan, and to kill a bunch of Palestinians.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Instead of going to war against this oligarchy he chose to cash his political capital on a rushed pull out of Afghanistan

          I don’t see how this is laid on Biden since Trump agreed to the withdrawal and timeline, and then R relentlessly hammered Biden for not getting on it, then relentlessly hammered him for the problems related to rushing it.

          I agree with the rest of your comment.

          • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            12 hours ago

            don’t see how this is laid on Biden since Trump agreed to the withdrawal and timeline

            Trump made the original withdrawal date and Biden arbitrarily stuck to it when he came into office.

            He was under no real obligation to stick to the timeline and it was a betrayal to every Afghan citizen that worked with us. I don’t really care what Republicans bitch and moan about.

            • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Fair opinion I guess, but I think there are plenty of things you can cleanly give Biden shit about before you get all the way down to complying with the troop withdrawal schedule that Trump committed us to.

              • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Eh, I guess it’s a matter of opinion. To me knowingly finishing your opponents mistake is worse than making an honest one yourself.

                I may be a little biased though, as I have had the opportunity to provide healthcare to a few of the Afghan interpreters that were lucky enough to evacuate and make it state side.

                I work in orthopedics and rehabilitation, so they had all been pretty banged up, missing limbs, or had lower limbs injuries that affected their mobility. But their personal injuries were nothing compared to how much uncertainty they faced about not knowing about the well being of extended family and friends still in Afghanistan, a home they will likely never have the chance to ever visit again.

                • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  All fair points, but what do you suppose the Taliban would have done to those same people and more if the US had not pulled out when Trump told them we would?

        • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I chose to see this as a glass half full situation. I hope that in four years we see this speech as a starting point in which the Dems run on a platform of economic populism.

          You may call me overly optimistic. However, the reason I am even remotely hopeful is that the very rich (and the media they own) are fully realigning with the GOP. This means Democrats will receive far less large donations in the future, and things will get shaken up, whether leadership likes it or not.

    • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It felt miraculous for me that, for a while, tech companies appeared to comply to regulation (doing the bare minimum, as slowly as possible, but it kinda worked).

      My hypothesis is that they now except political support from Trump administration and to pressure the EU?

      • Prime_Minister_Keyes@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Bingo. Trump already started playing with his corporate finger puppets, emboldening some, threatening others.
        Same reason Zuckerberg, surely the expert on the matter, had this weird rambling about “masculine energy” very recently. What a Trumpian phrase.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 hours ago

        My hypothesis is that they now except political support from Trump administration and to pressure the EU?

        Yes. We will now export our fascism, making it essentially just the same imperialism we’ve been engaged in forever.

        • Bogasse@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          To be fair, you haven’t invented fascism.

          Although, in France we have a sort of proverb that says that what happens in the US happens here 10 years later. I hope we will manage to dodge what’s coming at us, this time…

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I could see the EU backing down a few years ago, but these days they have watered down any actual advantage in search by filling their results with ads and low quality content. Not that I use Reddit any more, but a good Reddit search engine would probably be better for a lot of use cases.

      • timestatic@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Reddit search engine? Hell nah I want more federated communities. Reddit has a contract with google anyways that blocks out foreign web crawlers.

        • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          That’s what I mean. Their own native search that only searches Reddit. I’m not saying it would be great, just better than Google for many uses cases.

          This isn’t me talking up Reddit—I haven’t been back in over a year. This is me trashing Google.

      • fluxion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Then you got people like Musk using their websites as foreign influence platforms to restore Nazis into power so I’d imagine there’s an appetite for not being so reliant on the increasingly belligerent US media oligarchy, which itself is the victim of Fox News and Murdoch.

        Plus everything is already enshittified anyway so easy to create better.

        • Ledivin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Except reddit is all ai-generated bullshit now. Unless you search before 2024, searching reddit is literally useless, and that’s all going to be out of date so quickly

    • slaacaa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I would love that. I still use google products, because I was too lazy to switch, a ban would give me the incentive to move to another platform