• UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 minutes ago

      Probably after we switch from a First-past-the-post voting system to something more representative.

      Then people could vote outside the two party system without a spoiler effect.

      We can make these changes at the state level. Alaska recently voted to keep using Ranked Choice voting. Conservatives were mad because Ranked Choice voting allowed alaskans to choose a more moderate conservative over Sarah Palin and pushed to have a referendum to go back to FPTP voting.

      So why do Blue states use FPTP voting when it’s clear republicans prefer it?

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    75% of Democrats voted against it and 100% of Republicans supported it. The problem in this country is Democrats, because a portion of them side with Republicans sometimes.

    • rational_lib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Honestly the fact that 75% of Democrats voted against it is actually kinda surprising. In the past close to 100% of both parties were knee-jerk pro-Israel votes. This means there’s actually a good chance it won’t pass the senate. If people wanna call their senator instead of complaining online, maybe it won’t. I’m in DC so I’m allowed to just complain online until you give me my two senators.

      • mhague@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’d like to see a breakdown of this idea. Some people say Democrats seem to perfectly shore up votes to push through conservative shit, but the idea is the same color as “it’s them vs us.”

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Do the 75% of the Democrats call out and throw out the 25%? Like the whole ACAB thing, how are these people allowed to represent the party?

  • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    ·
    18 hours ago

    “Republicans want to sanction the ICC simply because they don’t want the rules to apply to everyone,” said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Massachusetts) on the House floor on Thursday.

    McGovern highlighted that Republicans are moving to erode human rights while ignoring urgent issues within the U.S.

    “We have a natural disaster unfolding in California right this second…. We have a gun violence epidemic, as we see massacres in our schools nearly every single day. And families are unable to make ends meet because they’re being ripped off by billionaire corporations,” said McGovern. “All those challenges, and this is what the out of touch elitist billionaire Republican party wants to waste time on. Sanctioning the ICC.”

    I liked Jim McGovern already, but I like him more, now.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Honestly, campaign on that.

        “My opponent supports genocide. They’ve received xxx,xxx dollars from AIPAC. They’re being funded by foreign interests because they put those interests before you.”

        And to any dem politicians out there thinking about it- AIPAC and Netanyahu fucked Biden. They are not your ally. They are not your friend.

        • Todd_cross@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          32 minutes ago

          Yes, but then they’ll be accused of anti-Semitism because people don’t understand the difference between Israel and Jewish people

  • HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    The list copied by hand from https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2024242

    Sorry for any errors

    • Boyle (PA)
    • Caraveo (CO)
    • Cartwright (PA)
    • Craig (MN)
    • Cuellar (TX)
    • Davis (NC)
    • Frankel (FL)
    • Gallego (AZ)
    • Golden (ME)
    • Goldman (NY)
    • Gonzalez (TX)
    • Gottheimer (NJ)
    • Horsford (NV)
    • Landsman (OH)
    • Lee (NV)
    • Levin (CA)
    • Manning (NC)
    • McBath(GA)
    • Meng(NY)
    • Moskowitz(FL)
    • Nickel (NC)
    • Norcross(NJ)
    • Pallone(NJ)
    • Panetta(CA)
    • Pappas (NH)
    • Peltola(AK)
    • Perez(WA)
    • Peters (CA)
    • Phillips (MN)
    • Ryan (NY)
    • Schneider (IL)
    • Schrier (WA)
    • Scott (GA)
    • Slotkin (MI)
    • Soto (FL)
    • Stanton (AZ)
    • Suozzi (NY)
    • Thanedar (MI)
    • Torres(NY)
    • Vargas (CA)
    • Veasey (TX)
    • Wasserman Schultz (FL)
  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I can’t be an American. There’s no way my politics are this divorced from the average person and I’m still an American.

        • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Because the options you get to pick from are also unamerican. And you get to choose between supporting unamerican and supporting facism. And that’s not a choice that leads one to patriotism.

          • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            13 hours ago

            No, the options are entirely American, and that’s the problem.

            It’s “the land of the free and the home of the brave”

            Not the intelligent.

            Not the compassionate.

            Not the effective

            Free and brave.

            • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 minutes ago

              Cue Lionel Hutz:

              "Oh no, those printers messed this all up.

              It’s the land of the Fee and the home of the slave.

              Better remove this bar logo."

            • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              13 hours ago

              I mean sure, if you look at the average citizenry. But if you look at the goals, it’s no surprise you are disappointed.

              I’m a (non-combat, undeployed, medically discharged) veteran, and tbh I regretted it within a few years of joining up because I realized a lot of things. And it’s really the same thing as civic participation. We are sold a myth, and over time realize the truth is that the people we have to pick from don’t share the same ideals we were led to believe they would have.

              So I totally agree with you, but our current crop are, indeed, unAmerican regardless of what the population has been led to believe is totally fine.

    • Drusas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Only approximately 30% of the eligible voters in this country voted for Trump. They are not the average person.

      What we need now is some polling on the average person’s views on the ICC and this in particular.