• db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m honestly fairly surprised as well, but at the same time, they’re not serving a model that can run on an A6000, and the people paying for unlimited, would probably be the ones who setup bots and apps doing thousands of requests per hour.

    • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      And honestly? Those people are 100% right.
      If they can’t deliver true “unlimited” for 200 bucks a month, they shouldn’t market it as such.

      grumble grumble unlimited mobile data grumble grumble

      • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        To be fair, unlimited is supposed to mean unlimited for a reasonable person. Like someone going to an “all you can eat buffet”. However those purchasing these would immediately set up proxy accounts and use them to serve all their communities, so that one unlimited account, becomes 100 or a 1000 actual users. So like someone going to an “all you can eat” and then sneaking in 5 other people under their trenchcoat.

        If they actually do block this sort of account sharing, and it’s costing them money on just prolific single users, then I don’t know, their scaling is just shite. Like “unlimited” can’t ever be truly unlimited, as there should be a rate limit to prevent these sort of shenanigans. But if the account can’t make money with a reasonable rate limit (like 17280/day which would translate to 1 request per 5 sec) they are fuuuuuucked.

        • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Yeah, poor wording on my part, proxy accounts being banned is totally fair, but a user using various apps and bots is the type of ‘Power User’ scenario I’d expect a unlimited plan to cover.

          • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Agreed. Like how fucking difficult is it to see “It costs us X per query, what Y rate limit do we need to put on this account so that it doesn’t exceed 200$ per month?”. I bet the answer to is hilariously low rate limit that nobody would buy, so they decided to value below cost and pray people won’t actually use all those queries. Welp. And if they didn’t even put a rate limit, also lol. lmao.