His answer is the octopus. What say you?

  • mipadaitu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s unlikely an aquatic species can achieve technological breakthroughs needed to spread like humans can. It would be very difficult for them to build fires, smelt metal, and create the advances based off of those tools.

    While they can be extremely smart and adaptable, it’s difficult to imagine how a species like that could develop machines.

    Sure, there’s possible ways around it, like natural vents and geothermal power, but why would they utilize these resources without a benefit like cooking?

    • Neuromancer49@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Shells or coral could serve as early tools, but (just my opinion) I feel it’s a little human-centric to assume fire and metallurgy are required to progress. Just because we did it that way, doesn’t mean another species would have to.

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 days ago

        Fire and tools were what we needed to become the dominant species, as they gave us power to take down the larger megafauna.

    • reksas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      whatever comes after us will have to make due with whatever crap we leave behind. There wont be enough natural resources left for them to use if they want to do anything larger scale or advanced