Please kindly take your grift to Reddit, Facebook, or Twitter
With AI generated articles, spam, research, images, tutorials all creating halucinations your AI generated x will be no better and will only create more untrustworthy nonsense that will only clutter the homemade communities, posts, and comments here.
Personally I’m sick of this AI crap that’s plastered everywhere like microplastics and PFAS chemicals. The cons most certainly outweighs the pros and the ‘tech panaceas’ like blockchain, nfts, and llms mostly serves to prop up the rich class.
For the 2 years I’ve been here the new fediverse feels like what Reddit used to be and should have been before the enshitification and honestly I love it here. So please stop. We don’t need a Reddit 2.0
I’m just here to say I don’t want to read AI generated texts. Not even when marked as such. I prefer human to human communication. Generation quality isn’t there yet by a long shot.
I get what you’re saying but so far in my experience here the vast majority of AI content is at least identified as such. AI content is here to stay and in my opinion attempts to remove/ban it will just make it more insidious. If you go back to Reddit AI posts/comments are everywhere and absolutely none of it is labeled. On lemmy people get to choose to interact with it which I think is probably way better
I disagree in that it should be allowed here just because:
“AI content is here to stay”
The reasoning for my belief is that the generation is near instantaneous in contrast to the effort that real people make to create things. The speed of creation creates an inherent problem in that it becomes near impossible to determine if that item is something worth of value to others, this causes a problem for both moderators and content consumers.
No one likes the time wastage that comes from low quality posts, comments, goods.
Time is something people can never get back.
Until the halucinations can be decreased to point where it causes no harm or is unnoticible, it will always have a more than likely negative cost to most people.
The argument that it should be allowed because it continues to exist is hard to justify in my opinion. The known and current cons are too costly to outweight the future potential pros.
Since AI content is usually clearly identified as such here, it is very easily blocked.
A social media site that you are not the admin or mod of is definitively not the appropriate place for you to attempt to enforce your opinions of what content is acceptable or not.
Downvote, block, and move on. Time is finite, and you are wasting it trying to police what other people should and shouldn’t post in a space where you have no authority.
Edit: To be clear, I agree about the dangers of AI. You might enjoy some of the discussions in Tech Takes on the awful.systems instance.
If society tries to suppress something that will find it’s way, you will get it back, but hidden, harder to detect and maybe even changed in a harmful way.
We had it as humanity with alcohol bans, war on drugs, hateful speech bans and etc. We need systematic regulations for unavoidable, not prohibitions which will leak from all places.
Leaving it be while being explicit is reasonable.
I agree. They can fuck off back to their AI filled cave.
absolutely i mean can you believe the audacity of these so-called elites sitting in their tech-filled caves thinking they can dictate our lives and control what we say and think its beyond ridiculous and we have to push back against this nonsense because they want to keep us in the dark while they pull the strings like puppeteers but we’re not their puppets we’re not going to let them dictate our reality anymore so let’s rise up and show them that we see through their lies and we’re not going to take it any longer it’s time to take back our power and tell them to shove it where the sun don’t shine
!^(generated by GPT4)!<
Removed by mod
Isn’t the AI content on specific communities for that can be blocked if you don’t want to see it?
There is a debate to be had about AI generated art, which is trained on artist’s work and may not be the harmless fun people might think. AI summarising an article seems a different beast as it is merely pulling from that one piece and, while there may be questions about accuracy, it doesn’t seem as harmful. I’d, personally, want to read an article myself but it could be useful for other people. I could see an AI summarising videos being an actually useful tool.
While I’m not particularly fond of using AI for any kind of truthful information, this post reeks of the classic “Quit having fun!” meme. Your value judgement of AI is no more valid than anyone elses, and honestly in my opinion, very misdirected and anger fueled.
It’s in everyone’s best interest for AI content to be honestly declared. You are almost certainly already consuming AI content from somewhere without knowing it because angry hate mobs have conditioned people to just lie and obfuscate their AI usage to avoid being the target of hate. And if not, you will eventually due to the power of the technology, as the entire creative industry is already silently integrating it, as everyone with an open mind knows, but the benefit of honesty towards closed minded angry people is none, and that situation is a shame.
Good AI usage is impossible to detect, and we should encourage honesty in regards to it.
It’s in everyone’s best interest for AI content to be honestly declared.
May i introduce you to the concept of corporations? It’s a frshly new thing from latest millennium, dunno if you’ve heard of it.
