The act of interacting on YouTube used to be an entirely public matter. You could say anything you want as long as it didn’t break any laws and trust it to be thrown into the public. Nowadays you comment on something, and there’s a 75% chance of you being shadowbanned without knowing why, with the video owner being the main filter of what people see, forcing feuds to take place not in comments but in back and forth videos, since this means everyone’s content has become their own little echo chamber, which means a stable argument is impossible, and combined with the fact YouTube is highly indifferent to even most of its most important rules broken, as well as combined with the fact popularity is based entirely on luck now, means anyone can use it as a platform to slander any person or topic completely unchallenged if they’re the one who gets popular while the challenger cannot. And because YouTube once had a reputation for being the best platform for information, most people who grew up with this reputation who have never had to deal with its modern incarnation don’t think to question anything. It’s a literal den of snakes now, you got misinformation trolls coming out its wazoo. What ways have you used to circumvent the issue?

  • sem
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    That is really cool! I am not educated enough to understand details. But is it similar to how a compiler uses high level syntax to generate low level assembly code?

    Is compiling a type of automatic code generation?

    • JayleneSlide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      But is it similar to how a compiler uses high level syntax to generate low level assembly code?

      This is an apt comparison, actually.

      Is compiling a type of automatic code generation?

      This is also an apt comparison. Most modern languages are interpreted rather than compiled. C#*, Java, Ruby, Python, Perl… these all sit on top of runtimes or virtual machines such as .NET or JVM. Compilation is a process of turning human-readable language into assembly. Interpreting turns human-readable programming language into instructions for the runtime; in the case of .NET, C# gets interpreted into MSIL which tells the .NET runtime what to do, which in turn tells the hardware what to do.

      Automatic code generation is more of “Hey computer, look at that code. Now translate that code to do different things, but use these templates I made.”

      FWIW, compilers was two semesters in engineering school, so I’m trying to keep this discussion accessible.

      *Before anyone rightfully and correctly jumps on my shit about C#, yes, I know C# is technically a compiled language.

      • sem
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thanks, this is all very interesting. I never knew what .NET was before. Now it makes sense that programs require you to host the specific runtime required for that version of the instructions for the runtime to work.