• nimpnin@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    All kinds of low risk things go down occasionally. Think of the 2008 financial crash for example. On average, or over a long time, you are very likely to make gains. But that’s not nevessarily true for shorter periods like 10 years even if you invest in low risk assets.

    Edit: I also invested some of my student loans in Finland. Or officially, my other income that was freed up due to the loan ¯_(ツ)_/¯

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      well he made the profit in like 2 years lol.
      Also there’s at least one bank here that specifically only has savings accounts, with pretty decent interest (like 2.7%) and free withdrawals at any time. And because it’s sweden the state will protect any money you deposit under like $100k per person.

    • frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      For the last year or so getting a 5% (1-3 yr) CD was not unheard of, so literally leaving it in a bank account is better than the annuity option by the above poster’s math.

      • nimpnin@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I don’t think you quite understand what I mean. You can’t extrapolate from the last 3 years. What you can extrapolate from is longer periods of time, where we occasionally see assets going generally down for some time. So you have maybe 90% chance of your stock portfolio going up in the next 5 or 10 years, and 10% chance of it going down (rough numbers but the point holds).

        So you can end up in a situation where you lose money, but it’s unlikely. If you are very risk averse, you would prefer a 0% increase over these odds.