Campaigning with the daughter of a war criminal was not a good look, even if it didn’t move Kamala right on any actual policy. It’s perfectly reasonable to look askance at me if I’m out there doing campaign stops with Uday Hussein, even if I still support a $15 minimum wage.
Okay, now compare “Campaigned with the daughter of a war criminal” to “Is a war criminal rapist felon con man with dementia.” You’re arguing that “Not a good look” is worse than “Possibly the actual Anti-Christ.”
You shouldn’t assume that everyone who criticizes Kamala Harris’ actions during the campaign supported Trump or didn’t vote. That’d make you just as tribal and reactive as Trump supporters.
Campaigning with the daughter of a war criminal was not a good look, even if it didn’t move Kamala right on any actual policy. It’s perfectly reasonable to look askance at me if I’m out there doing campaign stops with Uday Hussein, even if I still support a $15 minimum wage.
Okay, now compare “Campaigned with the daughter of a war criminal” to “Is a war criminal rapist felon con man with dementia.” You’re arguing that “Not a good look” is worse than “Possibly the actual Anti-Christ.”
You shouldn’t assume that everyone who criticizes Kamala Harris’ actions during the campaign supported Trump or didn’t vote. That’d make you just as tribal and reactive as Trump supporters.
Either you voted for Harris or you didn’t. This isn’t tribal or reactive, this is a basic understanding of how the election works.