Jomega@lemmy.world to 196 · 3 days agoGenerated "art" does not rule.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square119fedilinkarrow-up1800
arrow-up1800imageGenerated "art" does not rule.lemmy.worldJomega@lemmy.world to 196 · 3 days agomessage-square119fedilink
minus-square🐋 Color 🍁 ♀@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·edit-22 days agoArt theft is the antithesis of awesome.
minus-squareArcka@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·20 hours agoSomeone stealing any physical property is likely bad for one or more reasons. Also, you can’t steal an idea or a concept. Copying digital information doesn’t deprive the creator of the original. Copying isn’t theft.
minus-squarebig_fat_fluffy@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-22 days agoWhat if an artist makes awsome art from pieces of other people’s art? Is that awesome or not?
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·2 days agoIt is, it’s playful and meaningful and awsome. It’s my favourite kind of art. It’s what the biggest artists do. Art works like memes. When you don’t let people derive from each other, you suffocate art.
Art theft is the antithesis of awesome.
Someone stealing any physical property is likely bad for one or more reasons.
Also, you can’t steal an idea or a concept. Copying digital information doesn’t deprive the creator of the original. Copying isn’t theft.
What if an artist makes awsome art from pieces of other people’s art? Is that awesome or not?
It is, it’s playful and meaningful and awsome. It’s my favourite kind of art. It’s what the biggest artists do. Art works like memes. When you don’t let people derive from each other, you suffocate art.