I’m really impressed by the courage of the Amazon workers who are going on strike. I was thinking what if one of the conditions of the strikers is that Amazon stops funding Republicans. Then I realized more broadly what if workers in all companies went on strike and demanded that the companies no longer funded Republican candidates. What are your thoughts on this?

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    18 hours ago

    In general, people have got to stop voting with just their wallets and start voting with their labor.

    Guess what, if Amazon had no workers, it couldn’t generate money to donate to Republicans.

    • WeUnite@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I agree with you. Imagine if people built a mutual aid network designed to sustain people for maybe 6-12 months and the country just went on strike. People stop showing up to work everywhere in protest of the oligarchy.

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Most Americans live paycheck to paycheck, or close to it. A side effect of the top 1% holding 99% of the wealth.

        Also a ton of Americans are scared shitless of anything that even sounds remotely like socialism or communism while knowing nothing about either. Like paying billions of dollars every year for insurance which is exactly that, just privatized.

        • WeUnite@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Regarding living paycheck to paycheck that’s why I mentioned the mutual aid network. I know most people can’t stop working for very long, that’s why there would need to be some kind of group to support this.

          Regarding labels like socialism or communism, I’m not advocating for that. I just hope for better wages, working conditions and less corruption in politics.

          • quixotic120@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            16 hours ago

            A mutual aid network kind of falls apart if people can’t work for 80% of companies

            This is the problem with the dystopia. Where do an overwhelming number of jobs exist? Companies like walmart, amazon, target, mcdonalds, etc. you stop working for them en masse and all of sudden you have tens of millions of people unemployed. Mutual aid is great in theory but how do you overcome this? In practice it’s already terribly difficult to fund things like mutual aid networks because people don’t have much money they are willing to part with. Then you create an absolutely enormous demand on such a network? Doomed

            Even if you coordinate and target one company, eg amazon, all that will do is cannibalize their business and allow another company like walmart to fill the gap

            • WeUnite@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Your last sentence made me realize something. You’re right that if you target one business they will go to another but that’s a feature not a bug. The goal is it’s a negotiation. Demand better working conditions and stop funding corrupt politicians and then we will return back to work. The company won’t want to go out of business so hopefully they would agree.

          • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            A mutual aid network is a type of socialism. It’s no different than a union having a war chest to pull from for strikes formed from union dues, or a country having various social safety nets like unemployment for citizens. They’re all the same idea, just a matter of size.