MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net to Antiwork@slrpnk.netEnglish · 3 days agoEffort vs "work"slrpnk.netimagemessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up1382
arrow-up1382imageEffort vs "work"slrpnk.netMelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net to Antiwork@slrpnk.netEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square50fedilink
minus-squarerobinoberg@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoYou’re not antiwork, you’re anti-capitalism.
minus-squareOlgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-22 days agoSomebody can be both. And whatever purity test you think this post failed isn’t a helpful one.
minus-squarerobinoberg@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·17 hours agoWell, sure. One could also be a vegetarian and a Pisces. But that’s not relevant to the quite literal exploitation that is the issue in the OP
minus-squareOlgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-215 hours agoThe post is very clearly relevant, it’s addressing the innate problems of work. That’s antiwork.
minus-squarerobinoberg@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 hours agoNope, it is not. Exploitation is about capitalism, not work. People who do work without being exploited feel satisfied by it. From worker owned cooperwtives to grandma making a scarf.
You’re not antiwork, you’re anti-capitalism.
Somebody can be both. And whatever purity test you think this post failed isn’t a helpful one.
Well, sure. One could also be a vegetarian and a Pisces. But that’s not relevant to the quite literal exploitation that is the issue in the OP
The post is very clearly relevant, it’s addressing the innate problems of work. That’s antiwork.
Nope, it is not. Exploitation is about capitalism, not work. People who do work without being exploited feel satisfied by it. From worker owned cooperwtives to grandma making a scarf.