Archived version, for posterity.

Take note Bluesky fans: Your “benevolent” controlling nonprofit can quickly become a for-profit if enough cash is thrown at the governing board…

  • Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Reddit habits die hard for many.

    I don’t hate it, but I’m also not going to pretend it’s the hot, new decentralized microblogging service, come to shake up the status quo. It maybe has the potential to be decentralized, but it’s not currently. It might be a “public benefit” company now, but that’s not an official or regulated classification like being a nonprofit; it’s basically just a promise, and all it would take is a simple vote to change that. All the power still rests with the main corporation, and no matter how altruistic the leadership is, history has shown that every wealthy leader has a price.

    I hope it becomes what it promises it’s going to be. More decentralized services are a good thing for people. However, I don’t see it at this moment, and I don’t have any evidence that they’re making meaningful strides to become what they promise; time and inertia are not on their side.

    • Mandy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Not a single person in the world other than turbo mega nerds like us will ever care about decentralised platforms, or even know what that means.