Previously the reporting on this did not have a political angle and so it was removed from Politics and correctly directed to News.

The charges related to terrorism now give this a political angle.

“Luigi Mangione is accused of first-degree murder, in furtherance of terrorism; second-degree murder, one count of which is charged as killing as an act of terrorism; criminal possession of a weapon and other crimes.”

The terrorism statutes can be found here:

https://criminaldefense.1800nynylaw.com/ny-penal-law-490-25-crime-of-terrorism.html

“The act must be committed with the intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.”

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Terrorism is, by definition, a political action. Charging him with terrorism makes it political.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism

    “Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of violence against non-combatants to achieve political or ideological aims.[1]”

    There’s no question that the killing was ideological. I think where the charge has the potential to fall apart is “non-combatant”.

    If you argue that the CEO pushing the rejection of insurance claims is causing death, does that make them a “non-combatant”? 🤔

    Where it becomes a slippery slope is that this is the same excuse the “pro-life” movement uses for the targeted killing of abortion doctors, and they use the same tactics. Doxing, distributing hitlists, etc.

    • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      It pertains to a New York law above. The legal charge is defined.I would hope a judge would not consider an argument about what it is outside the parameters of what is written in the law.

        • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 minutes ago

          The judge explains the law to the jury, along with the idea that they shouldn’t apply their own standards for meaning as you do.

          I think it won’t get to a jury anyway. I have a hunch that he’ll plead guilty at some point. Like his idol Ted Kaczynski did. I think a jury would be bad for him in any case. Manhattan has the world’s largest concentration of FIRE (Financial, Insurance, Real Estate) employees.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 minutes ago

            It will definitely be interesting to see where it goes, it looks like he’s got expensive representation, and they’re already fighting extradition.