Summary

Senator Bernie Sanders is intensifying his fight against U.S. oligarchy, targeting wealthy individuals like Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and Mark Zuckerberg.

Sanders argues that these billionaires manipulate the global economy, influence elections, and control the government, hindering democracy and exacerbating global inequality.

He believes this issue is crucial, impacting various aspects of society, including climate change, healthcare, worker protections, and poverty.

    • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      The Dems lost anyway… If Bernie had started a party that did okay this time, it would do even better next time… Until it’s the Dems who are the “3rd party” and can either fall inline or get fucked

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        but the dems have won and a third party has never won and its bad enough having republicans in power half the time. having them in power for decades in the slight hope that they will be dethroned after that is the height of madness.

        • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          A third party has never been given a fair chance. Bernie is the first person in my lifetime who I think could pull it off… But he only has to get more people to sign up for his party than the Dems… 45m Dems, I think at least 15m go with Bernie… That would mean all he has to do is get 15m newbies to sign up… I think it’s doable, even if he actually had to get 25m.

          • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            all I know is it has not happened historically that I know of outside of the very founding of the nation before things settles down. Yeah the dominant ones morphed and sometimes changed name but it was not like an actual outside party became dominant. further I have had to live with the worse party being in power half the time for the last 50 years due to unsuccessful attempts and things have gotten worse and worse. A one step forward, two steps back scenario. I have said it before but its a choice of with or without lube. I get that some want to vote for no sodomy but having taken it without lube so much I am unwilling to not vote for with lube.

    • kittenzrulz123
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Considering Trump co-oped his rhetoric im pretty sure Bernie could have won without corporate support. He would have at least pushed the democrats to the left by threatening their left wing voter base. Or perhaps he would have convinced more people to vote who normally wouldnt have because the two options suck. Its easy for Bernie to say “wow I wish there was a workers party” but he literally could have made it and he has no excuse.

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        this same thing keeps being brought up with third party but it never happens. democrats lesson is the extreme left does not vote for them and going left does not help. Meanwhile rebublican administrations bring us more and more right and the dems oftentimes can’t even get us back to we were before another round of more right. could, perhaps but not really.

        • kittenzrulz123
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Ten million people didnt even bother to vote compared to 2020 and more roughly 33% of people didnt vote. Theoretically he could have won and not taken a single vote away from either party.

          • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            ten million would not have won and again taking any historical reality into consideration getting 100% of the possible eligible electorate is a pipe dream. I just can’t get behind something that has been shown not to work through all of history even though it has indeed been tried. I mean it did not even happen in the hippy erra when tune in, turn on, drop out was a slogan.

            • kittenzrulz123
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Historically it didnt work because nobody tried it and once again Bernie would have rather worked with the Democrat establishment then try to win.

              • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                It has been tried. continually. third parties are not a new recent thing. I mean the green party is about the environment which is the most significant problem in the world since the industrial revolution and has been recognized as significant since the 60’s politically and the party has existed in the us since the 80’s and its an international movement.

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        yeah or the reality we face today. the fact that republicans win at all indicates the problem. Yeah democrats are not what we would exactly want but republicans have gotten crazy comic villian level of bad and they still get in. If republicans were losing pretty much every election there would be a chance of a third party gaining traction but as it stands its a non starter.