Related:

Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to California Tailpipe Emissions Limits

The justices agreed to decide whether industry groups have suffered the sort of injury that gave them standing to sue over an unusual waiver.

  • Corigan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m sure the party of states rights will take issue with it in a few months…

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s not really a state rights thing though: my state is not allowed to do something like that on its own

      This is a federal thing that there’s a specific exception for California and the rest of us can only follow them or stick to federal standards

      Articles keep linking this back to the clean air act but I don’t remember reading where the exception is. If it’s in the clean air act, I don’t see how Trump can change that: it has to be Congress. If it’s an EPA regulation or executive exception, that’s another story, but hopefully would at least be time consuming

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    Eat shit, other states. We’re dissuading ICE because it’s polluting Los Angeles. If your state doesn’t buy enough ICE to make it worthwhile that’s a “you” problem.