• kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I can’t walk down the streets of Tel Aviv dressed like Hitler then there is a problem.

      If I can’t drive through a small town in 'Bama with a ‘I VOTED FOR HILARY’ bumper sticker then there is a problem.

      If I can’t go to a Portland Cider Bar wearing a Make America Great Again hat then there is a problem.

      • lukzak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        You keep putting yourself into the position where you GO somewhere. Sure, don’t go to Israel if you’re a Nazi.

        Don’t go to Alabama at all.

        Don’t go to Portland as a supporter of fascism if you don’t want to be labeled as a fascist.

        Don’t go to a 1st world country if you want to cut off people’s heads for burning books. Don’t go to places if you don’t support the principles they’ve carved out there. It’s not that hard.

        • kandoh@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t burn holy books if you don’t want sectarian violence.

          But of course the book burners do want violence, that’s the whole point.

          • lukzak@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Burning books doesn’t cause any physical harm to anyone. Someone that would hurt other people for burning books doesn’t deserve to live in a first world society. Whether it be the Bible, Quran, Torah, whatever. It doesn’t even matter if they’re baiting people into violence. They’re just proving that these individuals have those insane violent tendencies inside of them.

        • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There’s also a difference between burning one book and burning all examples of said book.

          It’s also a question of not applying your religion to others. Your religion does not allow you to burn your own book, but you can’t impose that restriction on others, as long as it’s a book that they own and are not burning someone else’s book in the legal sense of ownership.

        • kandoh@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          I support free speech but this guy clearly is using his speech to start violence and I don’t have to pretend to be too dumb to notice that.

            • kandoh@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              A cute sentiment but not one based in reality.

              I’m not allowed to visit Auschwitz dressed in Nazi uniform. I will have violence used against me.

              I can’t slowly drive around a small town in 'Bama with a gay pride flag and a I VOTED FOR HILARY bumper sticker. I will have violence used against me.

              I can’t enjoy a Cider at the Cider House wearing my Make America Great Again hat. I will have violence used against me.

              In each instance I’m not hurting anyone, I’m just making those around me uncomfortable and anxious with my (to them) questionable views. Yet everyone can clearly see I’m looking for trouble, that the ‘speech’ has the unsaid addition of ‘I want to hurt you when I’m powerful enough’.

              It’s easier to police the one person doing the antagonizing than it is to police the millions of people from the demographic they’re targeting, it’s inevitable that a few loons will take matters into their own hands.

              • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                15
                ·
                1 year ago

                These are false comparisons. This is an approved demonstration against Islamic violence(and such). But I guess we all forgot about Charlie H and all the rest. The man did not walk into a mosque on a Tuesday and light a book on fire.

                • Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah but if you insult the mob you can’t be all surprised if they try to kill you. Free speech protects you from the government. We live in a world were everyone doesn’t recognize the same rules law and order.

                  I look at this the same way as a white guy singing a bunch of rap songs using the n-word as emphatically as possible then posting it on youtube. Sure you have the right to say it but that’s not going to stop you from getting your ass beat

                • kandoh@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Individuals are responsible for their own actions. Blaming an entire group for the actions of a few goes against the principles of justice and fairness. Attributing the actions of extremists to all Muslims is like blaming all Christians for the actions of a few extremists within that group. Extremism exists in all religions and ideologies.

              • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                So you’re using examples where Free Speech has failed as an argument against Free Speech? Because you SHOULD be allowed to do the things named in your examples. That’s the ideal, were not there yet but that’s not a justification to stop the journey.

              • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                There you go again with weak arguments that don’t compare to this.

                Let’s try a different track: I’m asking you to to go to all of those places and do all of those actions. It’ll be more productive than either (good-faith) getting the conversation distracted responding to explain why those aren’t good points or (bad-faith) derailing things just for the fun of being contrarian.

                • kandoh@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  How doesn’t it compare?

                  This is an individual who hates Muslims, doesn’t want them in his country. He thinks they are dangerous, so he will prove they are dangerous by antagonizing them in the hope that a few hot heads will take the bait. Then he can say ‘look see, all Muslims are violent and we must remove them from our country’.

                  Just like the guy in the MAGA hat can then say ‘Look at how violent the Portlanders are’, just like the guy with the Hilary bumper sticker car can then say 'Look at how violent these rural bumpkins are. It’s active provocation, not a protest.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh yes he is an asshole. As much as I despise religion I would never lower myself to the level of defacing a book. He is also an asshole with rights, rights being threatened by much worse assholes.

        • girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Burning books isn’t promoting free speech. It’s literally the opposite. It’s sending the message that we don’t accept your ideas. That’s why the Nazis did it.

            • girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, you’re allowed to do it because you have free speech. But don’t say that you’re promoting the freedom of speech because you’re doing it. Book burning is an act that stifles the ideas of whoever wrote that book.

              More on topic, the two groups in question are both extremist groups that are opposed to the existence of the other. This isn’t about speech, this is about inciting violence.

              • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Book burning is an act that stifles the ideas of whoever wrote that book.

                The Koran really doesn’t have any ideas that need help. Humans have historically been pretty good at turning little girls into chattle and torturing people for gold. Are you really worried that there could be a day where those ideas are stifled?

                • girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  In this context, I was mainly referring to book burning in general; not specifically the Koran. In my mind, they are done only as a tool for hatred. But, fair point, I haven’t read it and if that’s what it depicts then I don’t think I’m missing out on anything.

          • emax_gomax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s a difference between burning one instance of one book as a protest and blacklisting hundreds of books and erasing all mentions of them and forcing everyone to not read them. One is declaring your dislike for something without affecting anyone, the other is erasing history. What you just did is a false equivalence.

        • Naich@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, I mean what is the MOTIVE for the people doing the book burning? What do they hope to achieve in burning it?

      • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        Books are for reading, not burning. But anyone should be allowed to burn any book they want to burn. It’s nothing but ink on paper.

  • not_me_now@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    1 year ago

    Imagine living in a world where you fear for your citizens because someone could kill them as a revenge for some burnt books.

    • corm@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unless a huge majority of muslim religious leaders are decrying seeking vengeance for things like this, and unless they’re all telling their congregations to be peaceful, then it’s a shit religion that I would be ashamed to be a part of.

      • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        We ARE condemning it. We’ve been consistently doing that for literally decades now. Did you even bother to check?

          • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            The list is literally hundreds of thousands. Honestly, go into any mosque and ask the imam. Follow any Islamic leaders; in the US it’s people like Imam Omar Suleiman who post a lot on social media. Or imam Khalid Latif on YouTube.

        • corm@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          So the majority of the muslim priests (imams) are loudly condemning it during their sermons? You sure?

          If so, aight, fair enough.

          But if I were you I’d do what a ton of people did for the catholic church during the whole child sex scandal, and leave to join an offshoot

          • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yes I’m sure, my mosque even livestreams the sermon on YouTube every week if you care to check.

            The fact that illiterate farmers in Pakistan are hurting people doesn’t mean I need to change my religion and has nothing to do with my prayers to God. I have as much in common with them as I do with Jack the Ripper. Should I change my citizenship because my country is full of racists? No, because they have almost nothing in common with me. Asking me to do so is because you are unable to deal with the stereotypes in your mind, not me.

            • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              doesn’t mean I need to change my religion

              I don’t think you need to do anything. It would be a wise decision for you to leave your religion, you know assuming you don’t live in a country where it is dominate and they kill you for doing that, but you don’t need to change it.

              and has nothing to do with my prayers to God

              There isn’t any God. You are talking to yourself.

              • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                How interesting that I haven’t tried proselytizing or converting anyone and are merely pushing back against islamophobia and hate, and you feel the need to push your beliefs on me?

                • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  How have I pushed you? Did I make you wear a hijab or torture you as an apostate? This is like that saying if you are so used to getting everything you want equality looks like oppression.

                  I gave you advice, you can follow it or not. There is no god, prayer and your rituals are a waste of time and effort. Do what you want with that advice.

            • corm@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re making good points and making me think.

              Although, I will say the attacks on people are far more common than jack the ripper (one guy). I think the catholic sex scanal was a much closer analogy.

          • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sigh. The attack on him was condemned by Muslims and Muslim leaders worldwide. Those condemnations were all over Muslim social media and TV in Arabic, Urdu, Swahili, Malay, Bangla, Turkish, Kazan, Uzbek, and the list goes on. Did you even bother to check? Or do you just assume all Muslims are terrorists?

      • ShakeThatYam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is a ludicrous statement. Obviously Muslim leaders shouldn’t support or endorse violent actions, but they do not have a responsibility to account for every misdeed done by members of their faith. Does every Christian church have to provide a response for every Christian nutjob?

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Does every Christian church have to provide a response for every Christian nutjob?

          Nope. They can remain silent and people like me will continue to point out their involvement. Please remain silent. Please please continue to let people do bad things in the name of Christ. Also Christ never existed.

    • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      It IS islamophobia if you think all or most Muslims are like that. Do you think DJ Khaled or Dave Chappelle wants to kill you?

      And that’s NOT what Islam says.

        • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No it does not. That’s a hateful myth spread by bigots who try and take things out of context. The sahih Hadith AND the Quran actually talk in great length about how to ignore trolls and ignorant people who bash you and your religion, and to “repel evil with Good.” The Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) himself signed the charter of Medina that guaranteed religious freedom.

          Stay back on topic. I’m a practicing Muslim, and there’s 2 billion Muslims out there. If my religion told me to kill people why is it so rare then?

          • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Then why are apostates and non Muslims treated so terribly in the Muslim world? And don’t tell me they aren’t.

            You sound like a nice guy. But your religion has far more than its fair share of fundamentalist jackasses, the kind of people who will threaten violence because a refugee halfway around the world burned a book.

            • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You’re trying to generalize 2 billion people and tie the actions of a few to the entire community.

              Indonesia has the world’s largest Muslim population with over 300 Million Muslims. It also is home to 300 distinct religions with centuries of coexistence. The majority of the worlds Muslims live in democracies and get along just fine. Places like Senegal and Jordan just don’t have what you’re describing.

              Pakistan is a poor country with a literacy rate of less than 50%. There’s a lot of violence there, but their Hindu-majority neighbor India with similar culture and poverty ALSO has massive religious violence problems with current lynch mobs and pogroms. It’s not the fault of a single religion.

              And FYI, the reason this book burning got any attention at all is because these countries bombed Iraq and Afghanistan, and the far right in the country is very public about hating Muslims and immigrants, so this was an attempt at trolling people. The Muslim community largely ignored the entire thing, because its very clearly an attempt at trying to insult, and have not tried burning things in response. The media is focusing on the 0.001% of the community that did otherwise, just like how the makers of South Park got death threats from Christians even though almost no Christian’s worldwide joined in.

              • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Never said it was, but I know multiple people who are non-Muslims in Muslim nations. The stories I hear from my friends in Egypt and Bangladesh are horrendous.

                There’s monsters in every religion, but prevalence varies. In Indonesia, they still actually flog people for being gay sometimes… And if I said what I really thought about Muhammad in Riyadh and I was a Saudi citizen, I would die for it.

                Oh, and no, I guarantee it’s all religious outrage, with the book burning. Stop trying to pretend it’s different. I get that you live in the West and want happy feelings about your religion, but your lived experience pales to that of my atheist and Christian friends who have to live in the Arab and Muslim world.

                • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Prevalence varies BASED ON socioeconomic factors.

                  I’ve lived in poor Christian countries that still jail people for homosexuality. Jamaica and Uganda lynch suspected gays, but Argentina does not. Wealth and education are the big difference between the two, not religion. And religious fundamentalism is on the rise all over in the developing world, if you ignore that and try to blame a specific religion in general then you’re missing the massive death tolls in places like Central African Republic or the genocides in Myanmar.

                  Saudi Arabia is a total dictatorship and a tiny one at that (Chinas has 2x as many Muslims as Saudi) ; say what you want in a Muslim-majority Democracy like Albania or Senegal and nobody will stop you.

                  There were some highly publicized incidents in Bangladesh but they were loudly and widely condemned by the public and the religious leadership, then the government caught and punished those who did it and made examples of them. Violence is a human behavior, but you can’t blame a religion for it when the religion explicitly forbids such behavior AND all the major religious leaders spoke out against it.

                  I’ve traveled extensively throughout the Muslim world, you’re just going off of hearsay and anecdotes, and you’re being condescending to boot. If you’re going to stubbornly ignore facts then I can’t help you.

            • ruford1976@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              @SulaymanF@lemmy.world is a big liar and he is trying to use Taqiyaa (deception) to show that his religion is peaceful. here is the proof of list of authentic hadeeths (which btw also teach you how to pray, because quran does not completely tell you how to) that apostates are required to be killed or reconvert to islam. https://sunnah.com/search?q=Whoever+changes+religion+kill+him

              here is proof that who ever disrespects allah/mohammad/quran need to be put to death.

              http://sunnah.com/muslim/32/146 http://sunnah.com/bukhari/64/84 http://sunnah.com/bukhari/64/185 http://sunnah.com/abudawud/40/11

              Quran 33:57-61:

              Those who annoy Allah and His Messenger - Allah has cursed them in this World and in the Hereafter, and has prepared for them a humiliating Punishment.
              And those who annoy believing men and women undeservedly, bear (on themselves) a calumny and a glaring sin.
              O Prophet! Tell thy wives and daughters, and the believing women, that they should cast their outer garments over their persons (when abroad): that is most convenient, that they should be known (as such) and not molested. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.
              Truly, if the Hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and those who stir up sedition in the City, desist not, We shall certainly stir thee up against them: Then will they not be able to stay in it as thy neighbours for any length of time:
              They shall have a curse on them: whenever they are found, they shall be seized and slain (without mercy).
              

              What exactly does it mean when it says that Allah “curses them in this world”? Some Muslim scholars have taken this to justify punishments of blasphemers.

              Quran 5:33

              Muslim scholars have also used verse 5:33 to justify the punishment of blasphemers:

              The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter; Except for those who repent before they fall into your power: in that case, know that Allah is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful
              
        • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s not a real word. Islamophobia means irrational fear or hatred of Islam and/or Muslims.

          Only bigots try to split hairs on definitions like this and say things like “homophobia isn’t homophobia if you’re not afraid of gay people.”

          • TheWheelMustGoOn@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes because an ideology is the same as being gay lol.

            And yes it might not be a existing distinction but one that can be made. Most Religions are stupid ideologies that I hate. Doesn’t mean I hate every Catholic for following an ideology that is for example homophobic as long as the person ignores that part of the ideology.

    • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      This isn’t Islamophobia.

      Islamophobia definitely exists, and is the phobia / hatred of all those who practice Islam, i.e. Muslims, via a generalization that all Muslims are extreme and dangerous. This is objectively false, and systemic Islamophobia needs to stop.

      However, this here is cause for concern, as there are a few extreme fundamentalist Muslims calling for the death of people over a burned book. That’s not Islamophobia, that’s a fear response to a direct, physical threat.

      Someone else in the thread mentioned some Americans calling for the death of anyone who burns the American flag. This is also extremely concerning.

  • ebenixo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck religion. you can pray to your sky God however you want but you don’t get to decide for others what they can or can’t do on their time

    • MaxHardwood@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Burn every science book and eventually they’ll be exactly rewritten. Burn every religious story and they’re gone forever.

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yeah, all major religions are known for their very level-headed followers. No need to worry.

    • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Muslims allowing islam to be known as ‘the religion of peace’ is one of the biggest doublespeaky manipulations around. They’re technically correct, because they’re referring to this line from the quran: “There will be peace on earth when there is no more al-fitnah”. Al-fitnah means ‘disbelief’ so what they’re saying is, there WILL be peace on earth, once we’ve converted everyone to our religion (forcibly or otherwise).

      I’m a bookworm, read voraciously, and as a sad lonely young teen who struggled to understand religious people, decided to read all the books. Hindu vedas; Christian old / new testament; Buddhist dhamapada; quran, and the hadith. Islam is an awful religion when taken literally, and the few islamic sects who are genuinely peaceful (eg ahmadi, sufi) are not even considered ‘real muslims’ by the more popular interpretations (eg sunni / shia / salafi).

      Don’t rely on out-of-context quotes from dodgy rightwingers, don’t rely on out-of-context explanations from muslims seeking to proselytise and make excuses, EVERYONE should read it for themselves so you’re debating on solid ground with facts on your side. My absolute favourite line from these particular religious texts is when Mohammed says he wants another wife to his (iirc final wife) Aisha. Aisha says something like, you’ve already had the maximum number of wives; Mo falls into a trance then says, don’t worry, I just spoke to god and he says it’s fine. She replies “Oh, how your god rushes to fulfil your desires”. Even she knew it was a crock of shit.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not the religion they’re worried about, it’s the adherents. And if you’re wondering why that is, there’s two towers in New York that used to be there and aren’t anymore.

  • Klinker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    They go and cry about muslim being intolerant yet they go and burn their sacred book which is considered the holiest thing for them.

    Am I the only one seeing the problem here?

    • girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I honestly don’t understand why you’re being downvoted. Book burning is probably one of the worst steps you can take towards being intolerant without directly harming people. There had to be so many more options that could’ve been taken that would’ve de-escalated the situation in a way that didn’t involve destruction.

      • OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s the fact that true tolerance would allow the burning of any book. Not all copies, not banning it from circulation, but the burning of an individual symbol as a means of expressing an idea is perfectly fine in most Americans’ view. I share that view, I understand the nuance of the situation at hand, I’m aware the quaran is a holy book and that it sends a strong message.

        But so does burning the American flag, as a symbol, to show that America’s ideals and values are dead or do not apply for the people doing the burning. American flag burning was done with the intent to express that the symbol of freedom and equality that it was pushed as was not at all representative of the America those people were experiencing. America has a problem with nationalism, so much so they tossed “under god” in a “non-mandatory” (socially reinforced) pledge of allegiance you say every day before school starts all the way until you graduate. You can imagine burning the flag pissed those nationalists off too, but their vitriol and frustration is useless and unwarranted.

        If you say the culture of Islam, or the culture of the people who see that book as their most holy symbol and use it to justify violence, is unwelcome in your nation, as an individual, that’s completely fine to me. I don’t love the blanket statement, but I do love that you can express it without fear of retaliation from your government and with the knowledge that you are as safe expressing that belief as you are expressing one more widely agreed upon.

        If I disagree with you, I should debate you, i should seek to educate you, or be louder than you with my actions and words. That’s not the way of every place in the world, but it is the way of any civilized people. Any who condone violence in response, even provoked violence, are closer to animals than their fellow man.

        • girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I want to agree with you but I can’t. The world can’t run by true tolerance; at least not in this day and age. There are too many beliefs, cultures, and ideas that are being eroded away by people that spout hatred. Why? Just because they can? Just because they have the right?

          If anything, the closest we can be is intolerant of the intolerant. The people that burned the books were an “anti-Islam activist group”. This sounds exactly like other hate groups like the proud boys, westboro baptist Church, the KKK, the EFF, Islamic extremists… These aren’t people that are celebrating their free speech. They are people that are practicing legal hostility as a tool to oppress others. I’d say hate speech is a good line to draw when allowing people to have public demonstrations.

            • girsaysdoom@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s a pretty broad statement.

              You can’t go into an airport and shout “bomb” or use a bullhorn in a residential area at 3 AM without someone calling the cops on you and being detained. You can verbally harass someone to the point of being abusive or lie about someone to defame them but you can face repercussions for it. There’s a lot of lines that intersect with freedom of speech. Just because I’m drawing one at hate speech doesn’t mean I’m against freedom of speech.

            • Klinker@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Is it freedom of speech to deliberately provoke an entire religion just because it is your “right”?

              It is my freedom to call you all kind of horrible names and slurs, does it mean I have to do it?

        • Klinker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Burning the American flag is a different ordeal. When you invade their country in the name of “freedom” don’t expect love and rose.

          Imagine the reverse, Iraq invading the US over fake claims of “chemical weapons” and imposing their political regime and destroying your whole way of life, imposing the Shariah Law (just like the US imposed their view of freedom). Would you still hold the same views? I think not.

    • Radioactive Radio@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There’s millions of those “sacred books” being printed by machines. Just go buy another one. They’re dirt cheap too.

    • metapod@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Its not like burning the quran is part of everyday life in society. More like they deliberate do it because they know its offensive for muslims, so its an obvious provocation disguised as freedom of expression. Im atheist btw and i despise religion in general, but sad to see reason being downvoted. Sorry i can’t back you up on the comment sections, i cant afford to be judged right now.