Study claims that "AI-generated poetry is indistinguishable from human-written poetry and is rated more favorably." WaPo, The Guardian, The Telegraph, and others picked it up. Here's my response.

theluddite@lemmy.ml · 12 days ago

Study claims that "AI-generated poetry is indistinguishable from human-written poetry and is rated more favorably." WaPo, The Guardian, The Telegraph, and others picked it up. Here's my response.

swlabr@awful.systems · 11 days ago

Just forwarding along the last mention of this by @blakestacey

theluddite@lemmy.ml · 11 days ago

Oh, thank you so much. That’s very validating! I can sometimes feel a little bit insane when I read these, to the point where I hesitate to publish because I worry that I missed something obvious.

Study claims that "AI-generated poetry is indistinguishable from human-written poetry and is rated more favorably." WaPo, The Guardian, The Telegraph, and others picked it up. Here's my response.

Study claims that "AI-generated poetry is indistinguishable from human-written poetry and is rated more favorably." WaPo, The Guardian, The Telegraph, and others picked it up. Here's my response.

Nature's Folly: A Response to "AI-generated poetry is indistinguishable from human-written poetry and is rated more favorably"