This time they are sending ALL of us to the ovens.

  • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well I, myself, am not currently personally on fire at this particular moment, which proves conclusively that climate change is a hoax and that our glorious, benevolent job creators deserve another tax cut and, fuck it, give em a bailout too just for the hell of it!

    Just don’t anyone dare give one of our innumerable homeless “people” in our innumerable tent cities a sandwich. That would just enable them to keep being poor. In fact, lets give people of net worth higher than a hundred million an annual, national civic award for occasionally having to see the homeless out of their car and limo windows, as a thank you for allowing the nation to bathe in the owner’s divine affluent light, that just feels on theme for us.

    • FarFarAway@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      They don’t care. But they also don’t realize that those paid armies are gonna turn on them real fast. What are they gonna pay the guards with when money is useless? Even if they hold some leverage, I bet most would crumble if the guards violently pried it away.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ll just move to the most inhabitable, least affected, parts of earth. Perhaps New Zealand, Argentina or Scotland.

      They don’t need bunkers. This is what the billion dollar yachts, private planes and multiple homes in many jurisdictions are for.

      Anyway, I don’t think it’s fair to blame only the rich. We live in democracies with free speech and accessible information.

      I know a lot of anti-nuclear activists and those people are not rich, but are definitely more guilty of causing catastrophic climate change than the millionaires and billionaires.

      Every advanced country could have achieved the 5 tons per capita that France and Sweden achieved in 1990 by using nuclear energy. And that would have solved most of the climate change problem. The reason it is so bad now, is because we squandered the past 35 years and increased our emissions instead of reducing them.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m 45 years old, an average schmuck and my carbon impact across my life is nowhere near that of a top percenter. I will absolutely blame them.

        • alvvayson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You do you. If you are western, you are probably emitting 10-100 times as much as the average world citizen, and even multiples of what your (and my) grandparents emitted.

          Sure, there is always going to be one guy emitting even more, so everybody will always point to someone else.

          I prefer to point to the anti-nuclear activists. Because they are the only reason we aren’t all like Sweden and France.

      • asg101@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They don’t need bunkers. This is what the billion dollar yachts, private planes and multiple homes in many jurisdictions are for.

        They will need bunkers when the oceans turn into giant vats of methane infused bouillabaisse.>

  • ZooGuru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honest question, what was the role of climate change in the Hawaii fires? Are they having a particularly dry summer?