WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden pardoned his son, Hunter, on Sunday night, sparing the younger Biden a possible prison sentence for federal felony gun and tax convictions and reversing his past promises not to use the extraordinary powers of the presidency for the benefit of his family.

The Democratic president had previously said he would not pardon his son or commute his sentence after convictions in the two cases in Delaware and California. The move comes weeks before Hunter Biden was set to receive his punishment after his trial conviction in the gun case and guilty plea on tax charges, and less than two months before President-elect Donald Trump is set to return to the White House.

Biden, who time and again pledged to Americans that he would restore norms and respect for the rule of law after Trump’s first term in office, ultimately used his position to help his son, breaking his public pledge to Americans that he would do no such thing.

  • samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 minutes ago

    Biden, who time and again pledged to Americans that he would restore norms and respect for the rule of law after Trump’s first term in office, ultimately used his position to help his son, breaking his public pledge to Americans that he would do no such thing.

    …after Americans voted that norms and respect for the rule of law don’t mean shit. Fuck 'em, I would have done the same thing.

  • banshee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I read over Biden’s statement, and it makes sense to me. Hunter was singled out for political purposes. It would seem weird if Biden didn’t issue the pardon.

    • Woht24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      35 minutes ago

      True. Further, being from the rest of the world, I really couldn’t care less and would likely do similar as Biden. The US people have dropped the ball, fucked the country and sent him packing.

      May as well, you’ve got nothing to lose at that point.

      Insert shocked Pikachu meme

  • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I mean, i can see why. What are a few drugs, tax fraud and gun felony next to being cumplicit in the genocide of an entire people.

    I bet Biden is proud of his son, for being a little better than him. Hopefully, Hunter’s son will only get speeding tickets.

  • 418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Damnit Joe! You could have at least waited for the December 16 sentencing. As a first time offender he might have gotten off with a slap on the wrist (depending on the judge) and you wouldn’t look like such a hypocrite for letting him just be sentenced. By acting preemptively, you’re just sending the signal that it doesn’t matter what crimes were committed, he won’t be held accountable. If you’re going to stand on principle for four years, doing nothing to ensure Trump faces consequences, why throw it away at the very end. What a clusterfuck our political system has become.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      American voters threw it all away and said that ethics don’t mean shit. He acted accordingly. Fair enough.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    12 hours ago

    We’ve spent the last decade seeing repeatedly that the law doesn’t mean shit for the red team; is anyone actually surprised that blue is saying ‘fuck it’ now, too?

    …but since we’re just openly abusing presidential power now, any chance he’ll use it to get something actually useful done, or we stopping at individual favors?

  • d00phy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    My wife read this to me last night.

    Wife: So apparently Biden pardoned his son

    Me: Cool. Can’t blame him.

    Wife: Of course people are say…

    Me: Fuck ‘em.

    Wife: You know because he promised…

    Me: Fuck ‘em.

  • Nick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Honestly, at this point, what do those pledges even matter? Integrity is not worth much in politics nowadays. People will just vote whomever makes the bigger promises.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Biden is proving he is willing to violate the norms to bail out their criminal family. But not use those powers for the average American.

      It is certainly impressive Democrats are willing to waive this away as a minor thing. Wasn’t their entire point that they are not the fascistic party but committed to law and order?

      • Ahrotahntee@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        and? Nothing he could have done would have made you support him so why in the everloving fuck should they care that you disapprove?

      • .Donuts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        12 hours ago

        No, the Republicans are the self proclaimed Law & Order party.

        I love how pearls get clutched when a Dem does it. Where were you the last 8 years?

        • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Republicans have been pulling these blatant violations for ages. Trump pardoned Blackwater criminals on his way out.

          Supposedly however Biden couldn’t load the courts or achieve anything because “norms and values”.

          Democrats achieved nothing and at the end took a steaming dump on those values they used as the excuse for doing nothing

          • amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 hours ago

            And a 100% valid one that you are being willingly obtuse towards. Open your eyes and see that although all politicians have and always will suck and lie, Trump is a traitor. I would elect any non-MAGA Republican for 8 years over Trump for four more. He is not a legitimate politician

            • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              Pointing out that republicans do this means you are comparing Biden to republicans. And you saying it is acceptable for democrats as well because republicans do it as well, not because democrats are better. This blatant abuse of power means Biden is a MAGA-democrat. And you are willing to elect MAGA-democrats.

              • krashmo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                9 hours ago

                The people defending Biden know this is bullshit. They just want to believe this is a sign that Democrats are finally going to stop complaining about decorum and play hardball. It isn’t, and they won’t, but at least Joe gets to protect his kid I guess. Too bad Joe couldn’t find the will to force Garland to do his job and prosecute Trump instead.

            • Grapho@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              You’re out here going “Ra Ra Biden, Trump does worse” all over the fucking thread calling others sycophants? Lmao

              • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                “All over this thread…”? Two comments and I really got under your skin. You deliberately avoid understanding me or my position, are devoid of nuance, and just make shit up to suit your narrative.

                Fuck off back to your troll farm.

                • Grapho@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  6 hours ago

                  Everyone I don’t like is a bot, the sycophants guide to political discussion

  • lzfm@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Off-topic, …with almost everybody having a cell phone in hands why do we still elect anybody to represent us? It’s because that’s how it always been?

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Because it’s hard for a committee of 334,000,000 to make decisions? Maybe I’m misunderstanding your question though. Are you suggesting more of a bottom-up, local-first way of running things? I think there would still have to be representatives at various levels, for the same reason.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Legislation is still pretty complicated, having professional legislators makes sense just as a technical profession.

      We could certainly stand to have more direct input though!

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      We don’t build bridges by committee, why would politics be better?

      It’s a specific skill set to understand legalese and the processes

    • amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      TBF I don’t think a system of thousands of referendums would be much better. What I take bigger issue with is the electoral college, but I don’t have a good solution in mind. Popular vote wouldn’t be much better, especially because of how it would affect campaigning.

    • psivchaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I think about this sometimes but the challenges for direct democracy are very hard to overcome. To vote right now, you go to a place and someone verifies your identity and then you vote on a machine that should theoretically have not just your vote but some form of backup to ensure your vote is counted.

      Obviously this would get really obnoxious if you were voting constantly. So something like change.org maybe where people can propose things and others can vote on them. But now how do we handle identity verification, and ensuring only one vote per person? On something connected to the Internet, how do we verify security? This needs to be even more secure than a bank, as every hacker and government in the world will want to sway the results.

      We could maybe distribute something like a USB key to cryptographically ensure everyone’s identity, but then you will need to handle people losing theirs, or theft, and it wouldn’t work great with cell phones. There’s other identity solutions like scanning documents or facial ID but they have their own security issues and also are a nightmare for privacy.

      I dunno. There’s probably a solution out there that might work, but it would take a lot of work to make it trustworthy and that work would largely be overseen by people the system is meant to replace so they aren’t exactly incentivized to get it right.