• Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    OpenWRT is cool, but I prefer OPNSense because unlike OpenWRT, you can actually upgrade OPNSense in its UI without requiring linux partition surgery.

      • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        I lost all my data from my router trying to update it using the ui and had to reconfigure everything. I use linux for a long time, but openwrt is on another level

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        The in-place upgrade process leaves a lot to be desired, in my experience. I understand why routers with limited storage capacity wouldn’t be able to support it, but the lack of A-B partitioning support for x86 and ARM builds in 2024 is really stupid.

        If an upgrade introduces a regression and breaks, my family is stuck without internet while I spend a few hours re-flashing an old release and making sure everything still works.

        • doughless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          20 hours ago

          The Linksys WRT3200ACM has A/B firmware support, but unfortunately that router is starting to get a little outdated. Saved me from a couple bad upgrades, but unfortunately it died on me about 4 months ago. I updated to the Banana Pi BPI-R3, which has been great for my network speed, but was a lot more complicated to set up.

        • Blaster M@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          This, right here, has been my experience every time.

          Also when you run a complicated setup with over a dozen VLANs, policy routing for failover internet on specific vlans, and nat66 support due to secondary internet only giving you a /64, yeah… not fun having to set all that up because the updater breaks, yeah… no.

      • Blaster M@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Every single time I’ve setup OpenWRT, keeping it updated was much more painful than anything else, even ASUS WRT-Merlin was easier to keep updated.

        • doughless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Are you trying to say you’re not a fan of needing to reinstall packages after an upgrade? It’s so simple with these easy to remember commands:

          opkg update
          cat /etc/backup/installed_packages.txt | grep overlay | sed s/\ *overlay// | xargs opkg install
          
    • Daniyyel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s why I wrote an Ansible playbook, to configure and update my router and access points. It’s nice having this almost as infrastructure-aa-code, with all configuration changes under version control with a clear commit message. The script is available at https://github.com/danielvijge/openwrt-configuration-ansible, but do make some changes to match your configuration. I keep my network configuration (inventory file) in a separate, private GitHub repo, as that contains passwords etc.

    • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Weird. Been upgrading several OpenWrt machines for many years now. Click a button in the UI, select a file, click another button to update.

    • Shimitar@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      OpenWRT is a different scope than opnSense.

      I have a few OpenWRT devices to cover WiFi in my home and definitely an opnSense on top of them for wan access and all the fancy stuff.

      OpnSense can’t to WiFi access point, thanks to BSD limited WiFi cards support, and definitely cannot fit on cots devices like OpenWRT can.

      As well as indeed opnSense is a better choice than OpenWRT for edge devices.

      While OpenWRT would do opsSense job, at least in part, the opposite is not true.