Jakylla@sh.itjust.worksM to Linguistics Humor@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agoSimple to say but hard to solvesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1134file-text
arrow-up1134imageSimple to say but hard to solvesh.itjust.worksJakylla@sh.itjust.worksM to Linguistics Humor@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square30fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMagnetar@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI mean they’re right, Leibniz used a modified s for summa, sum. And an integral is just a sum, an infinite sum over infinitesimal summands, but a sum nevertheless.
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoYes, they are right about that being the general concept. I only take issue with the implication that it’s equally simple.
I mean they’re right, Leibniz used a modified s for summa, sum. And an integral is just a sum, an infinite sum over infinitesimal summands, but a sum nevertheless.
Yes, they are right about that being the general concept. I only take issue with the implication that it’s equally simple.