fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agoflouridemander.xyzimagemessage-square211fedilinkarrow-up11.57K
arrow-up11.57Kimageflouridemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square211fedilink
minus-squaresleen@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·2 months agoI appreciate that you put some reputable sources, rather than relying on a random tweet/post.
minus-squareSquiddlioni@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up28·2 months agoThe source is not as reputable as it appears. The article in question is not from the Harvard School of Dental Medicine, and in fact was condemned by the HSDM. The actual dental experts at Harvard requested a formal retraction of the article: “Based on the significant flaws in the magazine article, we respectfully request that the article be rescinded, and a correction be published to clarify any misleading information that was provided.”
minus-squareAhrotahntee@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·2 months agoKeep in mind that they listed Canada as having non-flouride water, presumably based on the sole criteria that it’s not a national requirement. The split between communities with and without flouride in their water varies wildly by province.
I appreciate that you put some reputable sources, rather than relying on a random tweet/post.
The source is not as reputable as it appears. The article in question is not from the Harvard School of Dental Medicine, and in fact was condemned by the HSDM. The actual dental experts at Harvard requested a formal retraction of the article: “Based on the significant flaws in the magazine article, we respectfully request that the article be rescinded, and a correction be published to clarify any misleading information that was provided.”
Keep in mind that they listed Canada as having non-flouride water, presumably based on the sole criteria that it’s not a national requirement. The split between communities with and without flouride in their water varies wildly by province.