I’m tired of guessing which country the author is from when they use cup measurement and how densely they put flour in it.

  • inconel@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 days ago

    I wanted to believe my opinion is popular yet recipes I’ve seen are almost in volume and I don’t know why.

    Baking is chemistry for sure.

    • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      4 days ago

      My total guess is weighing scales used to be expensive / inaccessible for the common home baker and one of the first popular recipe books thus used volume, became wildly popular, and indirectly taught a generation of home bakers that baking recipes are by volume, not weight.

    • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      I feel like this is just a remnant of a time where a container with a bunch of lines on it was cheaper than a sufficiently accurate scale. It might just go away over 1-2 more generations.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Anyone who gets into baking today will quickly learn volumetric measuring doesn’t work.

        Basic baking you can get away with volumetric (simple breads, for example). Anything beyond that… Well, good luck.

        Scales have been cheap for a couple generations now. Digital scales didn’t exist until I was an adult, but the cheap spring type did. And those were maybe $5 decades ago. It’s more about awareness and knowledge. Cookbooks 50 years ago wouldn’t have had weight measurements because people didn’t have scales.

    • Pips@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      While it’s chemistry, there is a bit of an art to it, and you can be off by a bit and still have perfectly good bread.