• kittenzrulz123
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 minutes ago

    My Thinkpad T440p cost less then half that and many mini PCs cost around that much.

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    You can get an x86_64 mini pc for that same price. Or you can buy a used mid gaming rig for that same price.

  • LukácsFan1917@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This is getting closer to the meme about the Javascript-based streamed operating system.

    The only explanation I will now accept for how pointlessly laggy Windows can be is that Microsoft was deliberately increasing the latency to prepare customers for an online-only OS. Curse them.

  • MangoPenguin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Why is it so expensive? You can buy a fully functioning laptop with a local windows install for way less.

    Even the new mac mini is $599 and that’s a full on computer with really good performance.

    • anon232@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The article mentions this is aimed at enterprises who are already probably doing something like this with vmware ESXi

      • Ptsf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Doubt it’ll ever catch on with anything except maybe the largest of orgs. You can just procure office task ready machines so cheaply these days, and Windows 365 is like $45/user/month. Far more than what we pay for windows licensing, user Cals, and office licensing all combined.

  • halendos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Nice, more e-waste… Also, if it’s just streaming from the cloud, how is it so expensive? Its on the same range as a steam deck.

    • Anivia@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      16 minutes ago

      There is absolutely zero reason a thin client needs to cost this much, unless this has some seriously high-end multi-monitor capabilities

      Even a Raspberry Pi 5 is a capable thin client that can run 2 4k monitors

  • EmperorHenry@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Oh…so they just want to take all control away from the user? I won’t be buying that, I’m sure it eats up a fuck ton of bandwidth too