For example, let’s say Bernie Sanders was the nominee in 2024 against Trump. A lot of people on the internet seem to like him, even some conservatives. But would liberals fall in line and vote for him enough to beat Trump?

Bernie’s supporters always seem to attack the Democrats liberal base, do you think they’d sit home if Bernie or any leftist was the nominee.

  • OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 hours ago

    No. Liberals have always been closer to fascists than socialists. Look which way liberals in Weimar Germany went.

  • CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 hours ago

    No. And they’ve said as much.

    “Clinton would not pledge to support Sanders if he won the 2020 Democratic nomination.”

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-sen-bernie-sanders-likes/story?id=68424746

    “However – I do reject socialism as a economic system. If people have that view, that’s their view. That is not the view of the Democratic Party.” - Pelosi

    https://edition.cnn.com/2019/04/15/politics/nancy-pelosi-socialism/index.html

    • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s so sad to see this, especially knowing that while you can like or dislike Clinton and Pelosi, I doubt they are unware that Sanders is not proposing socialism. Socialism and social democracy are two very, vastly different things. And they for sure know this very well.

      I sincerely hope that Sanders will found a new party soon, it will have 4 years to gain momentum. Will it win in the next election cycle? No, but it might actually get enough votes to win in 8 or 12 years. Just do it.

  • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Assuming Bernie could get on the ticket, I absolutely believe people would have voted for him.

    The problem is of course getting him on the ticket.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Liberals already tried to get Bernie on the ticket in 2016, but the DNC fucked us on that.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 hours ago

    the haters, the racists, the sexists, the homophobes, the gun fondlers, the diesel fume huffers, and the bible thumpers vote repulbican every. single. time.

    too many democrats jump ship and stay home, vote for the no chance party, or republican if a candidate doesn’t support every little policy and issue they want or who supports something they don’t. even if the fate of the nation and democracy is at stake, they’ll abandon reason.

  • Rottcodd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I sincerely have no idea.

    The narrative that a leftist couldn’t win is repeated so predictably and so often and by so many people that the whole idea has become sort of detached from reality, and there’s no telling what would happen if it was actually a possibility.

    And particularly since the one thing I’d pretty much guarantee is that the concerted efforts on the part of the ruling class to prevent a leftist from running would be as nothing compared to what they’d do and say in order to prevent one from winning.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I think democrats would, for the most part. Perhaps less enthusiastically, but since they hate Trump, I think it would not be a major issue.

    The question is, how would low-information unaffiliated voters respond to having a socialist in the ballot? This is a difficult question to answer. Traditionally socialism is a bad word in US politics, albeit less so with younger voters.

    Personally I don’t really buy the “Bernie would have won” stuff but there’s really only one way to find out.

    • BadmanDan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I don’t think a Demo candidate can afford to have low enthusiasm amongst liberals, that’s their biggest base.

      • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Except all the liberals insisted they would vote for Biden’s corpse before letting Trump win. What does it say about them if an actual progressive is the real dealbreaker?

  • jeffw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 hours ago

    No. When you leave social media echo chambers like Lemmy, you hear liberals and others right of center talking about how Kamala was too liberal.

  • Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I mean, at least for me, the question is “Who?”

    In more ways than one. It’s quite evident to me now that a candidate needs to be charismatic, not just have some good ideas, to motivate voters to take their side. But “leftism” and “leftist” are still pretty vague labels. Just personally, some of the left-wing figures in the US today would earn my vote and some would not. More broadly, and I think there’d be a big difference between voters-at-large’s willingness to accept Bernie-esque proposals and some of the more out-there stuff I’ve seen.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Sanders? Probably.

    Someone else? Depends on their policies and what you mean by “liberals”. If you mean general center-left / Democrat base types, probably they vote for the DNC nominee. If you mean people devoted to Enlightenment Liberalism, it depends on how authoritarian the the candidate is.