• Anamana@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It works better for me as an app. I don’t like my browsers to be cluttered like that. But if it fits your usecase

        • ripcord@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s why I like Chrome’s (and various Chromium browsers’) ability to app-ify sites. Will create a .app in MacOS, .desktop in Linux, etc. Launches as what looks like an independent app with its own dock/launcher icon. Utilizes most of their PWA stuff.

          Sadly, it looks like Chrome has hidden the option completely in the latest version unless you set a flag that will probably go away in a few releases. Edge makes it pretty clear.

          I wish Firefox would bring the feature back. They deprecated it years ago and I use it heavily (only reason/time I use Chromium stuff on most of my machines)

          • Anamana@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I know it from Android and I was using it quite frequently as well. But in my opinion it’s better as a website alternative, compared to being a complete replacement for apps. Things are less buggy and more smooth for me that way.

        • TigrisMorte@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I fail to understand how opening a web site, which is all a browser does, can be defined as ‘cluttered’, but my use case is security while appears yours is to let corpos rummage through your files.

          • Anamana@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s inconvenient and disorganized to have it as an extra tab (taking up tab space) or browser window (same symbols), also it runs smoother for me within the app.

            but my use case is security while appears yours is to let corpos rummage through your files

            I care about UX & seems like I’m not the only one at that. If I would care about privacy and security I wouldn’t use discord, but matrix or sth.

      • etrotta@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why would you want to block their telemetry?
        It is not like they’re using it to serve ads to you, and it should be better for everyone for developers to make decisions based on how users are actually using their app, no?

        • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s simple. Nothing that happens on my device is their data.

          Any telemetry that isn’t explicitly opt in with zero consequence for not doing so should be the kind of illegal that gets every asset your company owns seized immediately for non-compliance. All user data collection is spyware.

        • cmrss2@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The desktop client logs and sends lists of currently running processes by default, and they also collect usage data (which channels you open, how long for, who you’re interacting with). In the settings, there’s literally an option for “Use data to customize my Discord experience”. And sure, they don’t show ads, but their third-party integrations do. Article with sources

          In the end, processing and storing millions of texts, images, videos and files permanently, and hosting all those live voice and video calls, and making updates to the clients, will always cost more than what they get from Nitro and server boosting. Discord isn’t profitable; they have to make the deficit up to shareholders somehow.

      • Anamana@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fair, but from a UX and technical perspective it’s a pain in the ass to use it like that

        • Dojan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          At my old workplace I used it in the browser daily. Wasn’t really an issue at all.

    • MakeItCount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes as I manly use it on phone

      So for the once on a blue moon when I’ll open discord on my PC, the browser is enough

    • Durotar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Discord is a web app, there’s no other way. You either use your main browser or the one they’re bundling it with.

      • Anamana@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If it’s just a WebApp, then why does one of the commenters have issues to run it without the browser?

        See: https://feddit.de/comment/2192027

        Edit: And I know that you’re right technically, still there is a difference in how you run it when using a browser vs Webapp.

        • Durotar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Theoretically, it may have additional features when it’s bundled with Electron, but ultimately there’s nothing wrong with running it in the browser.

          • Anamana@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Nah I know there’s nothing wrong with it. I was just surprised so many people do it. But I guess we have a privacy-aware tech bubble here