• Chipthemonk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah the classic stolen lands argument. You seem to think that the lands were widely populated with a dense civilization by people that had a concept of land ownership. You might be surprised to know that the americas were not densely populated in the slightest and most of the people who migrated to the americas through Siberia (the “natives,” who are actually just early migrants from the Middle East like all early Homo sapiens) don’t always have a concept of land ownership because they lived nomadic lives.

    Your arguments are juvenile.

    • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ahh I see. So genocide is a-okay as long as the victims weren’t densely populated and didn’t think of land in line with the European sense of ownership.

      Really, if they didn’t want to be brutally murdered, there should have been more of them and they should have created bits of paper saying who owned what land.

      Makes sense.

      • Chipthemonk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your argument is in fashion, but it’s simply not the reality. I suppose your argument is so popular and widespread because the history curriculum has not done a good job educating people.