Neo-Nazis and the Far Right Are On the March in Ukraine
www.thenation.com
Five years after the Maidan uprising, anti-Semitism and fascist-inflected ultranationalism are rampant.

Here’s how Ukraine was being reported by the West before the war.

Today, increasing reports of far-right violence, ultranationalism, and erosion of basic freedoms are giving the lie to the West’s initial euphoria. There are neo-Nazi pogroms against the Roma, rampant attacks on feminists and LGBT groups, book bans, and state-sponsored glorification of Nazi collaborators.

These stories of Ukraine’s dark nationalism aren’t coming out of Moscow; they’re being filed by Western media, including US-funded Radio Free Europe (RFE); Jewish organizations such as the World Jewish Congress and the Simon Wiesenthal Center; and watchdogs like Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and Freedom House, which issued a joint report warning that Kiev is losing the monopoly on the use of force in the country as far-right gangs operate with impunity.

Five years after Maidan, the beacon of democracy is looking more like a torchlight march. A neo-Nazi battalion in the heart of Europe

If you whitewash NAZI POGROMS just because you want to beat Russia, fuck you. Siding with far-right fascists to defeat far-right fascists doesn’t make you the good guy. There is no lesser of two evils here.

If you dismiss any criticism of Ukraine as Russian propaganda, you might want to ask why the rest of the world, including the West, was concerned about Nazism in the area and then suddenly changed their tune only after the war started.

We should be getting both sides into peace negotiations, not prolonging the bloodshed and providing Nazis with illegal cluster bombs

    • Dolores [love/loves]@hexbear.netEnglish
      3·
      1 year ago

      Russia has attacked civilian targets and infrastructure.

      “OHCHR verified a total of 9,444 civilian deaths during Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as of August 13, 2023. Furthermore, 16,940 people were reported to have been injured”

      you’re still making a legalistic distinction “attacks on civilians” vs. “attacks on combatants” these attacks on “combatants” clearly contain civilian deaths, so what actually is the difference to you besides who’s doing the murder? e: this is combative, not how i intended it. but i think the fact of civilian deaths emerging from the category of ‘attack on combatant’ is very destabilizing for using that as a discrete category from ‘attack on civilian’, is it not?

      • ZoomeristLeninist [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.netMEnglish
        5·
        1 year ago

        im going to disengage after this bc i dont think either of us have anything to gain by continuing. i do respect ur opinion on this tho, and even tho i have some disagreements, i also agree with much of what youve said and dont think our difference in opinion is a dealbreaker.

        the last rebuttal ill give is this: combatants and civilians are materially different— one has and is using weapons. and intentional civilian attacks have a higher rate of success than accidental civilian attacks, so intent matters. also the supposed russian attacks on civilian targets are spurious and fog of war makes it difficult to make value judgements at this time. what i was focusing on is what we know: the situation in the Donbas before February 2022.

        thank you for ur input, its helpful to have differing views heard to prevent this place turning into an echo chamber