lemme in@lemm.ee to Privacy@programming.dev · 6 months agoPeriod tracking app refuses to disclose data to American authoritieswww.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square86linkfedilinkarrow-up1572cross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1572external-linkPeriod tracking app refuses to disclose data to American authoritieswww.newsweek.comlemme in@lemm.ee to Privacy@programming.dev · 6 months agomessage-square86linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoAll you’ve proven is that neither your claim nor mine is provable. That still doesn’t make you correct. It means neither argument can be proven. At least my argument is logical. You’re convinced Apple would risk blowing up a $3.3T empire for $10M. Get real.
minus-squareunexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up8·edit-26 months agoIn software security, not proven to be secure = not secure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provable_security
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoProve it. https://security.apple.com/bounty/
minus-squarePunnyName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·6 months agoTheir opinion is more valid regarding safety, because it’s skeptical of the behaviors of an international megacorp, which is the smarter approach.
All you’ve proven is that neither your claim nor mine is provable.
That still doesn’t make you correct. It means neither argument can be proven.
At least my argument is logical. You’re convinced Apple would risk blowing up a $3.3T empire for $10M.
Get real.
In software security, not proven to be secure = not secure
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provable_security
Prove it.
https://security.apple.com/bounty/
Their opinion is more valid regarding safety, because it’s skeptical of the behaviors of an international megacorp, which is the smarter approach.