• Lightor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 days ago

    Wait so the idea is do not sleep with any men? Even men who support your views and rights? This just seems like it would radicalize more incels or generate more sexism. Like the average person who did everything they could is going to go on a date and be told “I’m not have sex until the government is fixed” which would make me say “ok, well, hit me up in 4 years.”

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      11 days ago

      The idea isn’t for women who are already in relationships with partners who support women’s rights. The idea is more, for single women, to refuse to start any relationship at all right now. Which honestly, in an era where basic women’s healthcare is under attack, maybe starting a relationship right now isn’t the best idea. Will your women’s rights-supporting boyfriend agree to become abstinent when the birth control you’re using is taken off the market due to conservatives? Or will they want to move to the pull-out method or just accept the risk of being pregnant?

      If you’re a single woman, honestly, right now, maybe staying single through these next four years isn’t a bad idea. It has nothing to do with the actions or beliefs of a potential partner, and everything with the fact that being a woman in any straight sexual relationship when conservatives are ascendant simply has a lot of unavoidable risks with it. The religious crazies in power believe that the only veto a woman deserves over being pregnant is the choice to have sex or not. And they seek to take away any way for women to prevent getting pregnant besides not having sex. These Christian nationalists, who were just elected, believe that the only choice women have should be pregnancy risk or abstinence.

      You need to have a reality check here. The United States federal government, and the majority of state governments, will be telling every woman of reproductive age, “be abstinent or risk pregnancy. Any other tool to prevent pregnancy is morally wrong.”

      The government is literally trying to coerce women not to have sex before marriage. The government is literally trying to coerce women not to have sex before they’re ready to become a mothers. The people soon to be in charge of the government literally believe that the only just use of sex is pregnancy. And they rule accordingly.

      In what universe would you expect this to not result in a complete collapse of pre-marital sexual opportunities for straight men? It’s not about punishing men. It’s not that you do or do not have the right views or beliefs, or that you are a good or bad person. It’s simply that for women, in this world that is being created, having sex before marriage simply isn’t safe.

      Sexual liberation was possible only due to the availability of effective contraception, birth control, and abortion. If you turn the contraceptive landscape back a century, sexual norms will have to return there as well. You are NOT going to have a world where there’s no access to contraceptives where women are still perfectly happy being in sexual relationships before marriage.

      Men, I hope you’re ready to put a ring on it. Otherwise, you ain’t gettin’ any. Sorry, you wanted this world; you voted for it.

      • NeilBru@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Sorry, you wanted this world; you voted for it.

        You seem to be unaware or are forgetting that the majority of white women wanted it too. The exit poll stats show the majority of people across the board in about every demographic “wanted this world”; it was a massive defeat for the vestiges of the American political left.

        The Trump campaign successfully set up their media machine to equate every environmental protection, women’s autonomy, labor protection, and re-enfranchisement policy proposal of the working class to a talking point of a screeching radical feminist harpy cartoon character that’s bent on “destroying the patriarchy, churches, and America.”

        The DNC handwaved the concerns of the working class away again to fellate the billionaire and corporate donors, the “moderate” republicans, and the social justice warriors simultaneously, thinking that would work somehow.

        The blame lies on the us if we let the DNC establishment keep their jobs in the next round of primaries.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        So this is where we are now? All men wanted this? All men voted for this?

        What next level bs is that. I did not vote for this. And if this is the blanket us vs. them that women are espousing then sexism is only going to get much worse. I did not vote for this, but people like you are starting a gender war for no reason. You are breeding sexism.

        I need a reality check? The irony. You need to understand that a majority of women voted for this and not all men did. Women like you seem so ready to hate these days. If women keep attacking anyone and everyone because of what a small section of that group did they’ll have no allies very soon.

        But sure, encourage all women to not be in a relationship. Encourage another form of isolation for women who may find great happiness in having a partner.

        So much resentment and vile in your response. You’re so ready to have a war to fight, you don’t much care who it’s against. How much your approach to problems lines up with MAGA is uncanny.

        • orcrist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 days ago

          All you can think about is men. That’s just sad. Please try to look around more. The point is that this is about women protecting themselves, not about how you voted or feel.

          • Lightor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 days ago

            Nope, sorry, I mentioned how this can impact women’s mental health too. I genuinely care but you can’t see past me disagreeing with you. Sorry you’re so defensive that it prevents us from having an adult discussion. We tried.

        • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          So this is where we are now? All men wanted this? All men voted for this?

          It’s not about punishment. It’s about practicality given the circumstances.

          I did not vote for this either, but it would be foolish to not acknowledge that sex will become far riskier for women if they do not have access to abortion and contraceptives.

          The preceding commenter’s response wasn’t vile or hateful. It was a very matter-of-fact presentation of the situation that we (as a society) are facing.

          • Lightor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            “Sorry, you wanted this world, you voted for it”

            That is very toxic. Maybe women voted for this and many men didn’t. My point is this kind of talk does nothing but create more sexism. Yes sex is riskier, yes I can understand abstinence, but what I can’t understand is villainizing all men. We can’t ask why young men are turning out hateful if we constantly treat them like the enemy.

    • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      11 days ago

      I mean, it isnt like it is the job of women to sleep with men in order to prevent them from becoming incels, that would be essentially like victim blaming at a population level. Im also not really sure that it would do much: most women arent going to do this, so the impact on average men’s dating prospects is much smaller than the total lack of dating for any women that actually go through with it, but nobody is seriously suggesting that doing so will turn them into something akin to incels.

      I dont expect this would really help much, beyond the obvious personal benefit that not becoming pregnant in a state that is hostile to women’s reproductive health would have, but incels were going to hate and complain about women regardless of the sexual habits of those women, so I dont see it really making things worse in that regard either.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Never once said it was their job to sleep with men. I’m saying this will cause more sexism and isolation. What does this accomplish? Think of a woman wanting a connection, going on a date, and telling him she won’t sleep with him. That’s not a relationship most would be interested in. This will result in her isolating herself.

        Thinking that an entire group of women refusing to be in relationships because of what some men did is just hurting them and snubbing people who are allies. I am all for women’s rights, I even got a vasectomy so my partner feels more comfortable and worries less. But if I were dating and ran into people like this it would put a bad taste in my mouth. I just don’t see the point.

        • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 days ago

          I mean, arent they swearing off dating as well though, not just sex? You wouldnt even get that situation of going on a date and then telling the guy that if they arent even going on dates in the first place.

          I do actually agree that this might not be the most mentally healthy reaction, at least for straight women that actually would otherwise want to date men, but I dont really think that it is really the fault of the women themselves, I think that it is the kind of angry or fearful reaction to being put in a dangerous situation that, while it might not really help, is at least understandable and not some failing on the women’s part. The problem, in my mind, is the situation that leads them to be this upset in the first place.

          • Lightor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 days ago

            I get they might still date, but at some point a relationship becomes physical. Having a barrier to that can very negatively impact the relationship. There are certain people who are fine with low/no sex, but I don’t believe that’s the norm.

            I can understand this reaction, but as you said this is not the best approach for mental health. I don’t see it as a failing, I see it as a very reactionary move that wasn’t fully thought out.

            I agree on your last point for sure, the situation is fucked and I can’t blame anyone for being scared or angry about it.

      • Lightor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 days ago

        Yes, and person treating people this way will eventually result in the opposite of what that person wants. Actions have consequences.

        • JayObey711@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 days ago

          Imagine being bothered because some people don’t want to sleep with you (?) is everything ok? What’s going on? I honestly don’t understand what your problem is at all. If all humans in the world suddenly became celibate that’s their thing. Like who are you? Sexy police?

          • nomous@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            11 days ago

            I love the immediate switch to ad hominem.

            “Obviously nobody wants to sleep with you! You must be mentally unwell”

            Do you think it’s healthy to tell (and pressure) women to not be relationships until laws are changed?

            If I were interested in weakening a nation, counseling the youth to walk away from relationships and turning the genders against each other would be a pretty decent tactic.

            • JayObey711@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              11 days ago

              I actually didn’t imply that you are unlovable in any way but ok. I asked if you are ok because this seems to effect you a lot. Your reaction is not normal. You are making up problems in your head. Do you really think every women you meet will look at you in disgust and refuse to talk to you because of how you look? There are real problems out there. Liiiike bodily autonomy. Wich these brave young women are drawing attention to.

              • nomous@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                11 days ago

                I’m not the other commenter. I have a long term term partner and we’re happy together so I don’t really care what any future woman does or doesn’t do with me.

                I just don’t think this 4B thing will even ever happen, I think discussing it like it’s real is stupid and will only impact the terminally online and it’s likely just more Russian psy-ops designed to turn one group of Americans against another. We already have a whole legion of incel young men, maybe we need to brew up a batch of hateful young women incels to further fuck our society up.

              • Lightor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                11 days ago

                Have you made up this whole story in your head? You’re just saying random things like they’re fact. Are you MAGA, because that’s kinda their thing.

                I’m all for body autonomy. The irony is I’m calling out a risk to women’s mental health and you are getting upset for some weird reason. Then you randomly talk about my looks? You don’t even know what I look like.

                Do you need help? Are you in crisis?

          • Lightor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 days ago

            This isn’t about me, and even if it was, I’m married. We have sex lol.

            I pointed out that this could cause mental stress on women. It could cause isolation for some, and then you make all these wild assumptions. Are those projections? Are you ok?

        • spujb@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          “women deciding what to do with THEIR bodies will eventually face the opposite (further misogyny) and that’s THEIR fault, actually”

          sexism apologia? upvoted on my fediverse? it’s actually not a fucking surprise. this place is a toxic masculine hellhole

          for the record, in no case is it acceptable to blame the self-preserving actions of a minority for radicalizing the majority. that is the language of abuse and oppression.

          • Lightor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            What no? Wow, jumping right to rape. You know what the whole point of this is right? It’s an act of protest. A protest has a purpose. This one is for women to be treated better. But if, in that act of protest to get more support, you villainize an entire gender then you’re probably ending with a net negative addition to your cause.

            The fact that you didn’t realize I was talking about the purpose of this whole thing, and just jumped right to being sexist and shit is just top tier basement troll move. Think more, react less.

            • spujb@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              thanks, i have corrected my misreading in an edit. apologies for any undue hard feelings.