I was just reading this post https://old.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/1gmv76n/is_reddit_going_to_remain_the_primary_space_for/ and many barely see the fediverse as an alternative and they seem to have a negative bias towards it. Super ironic when it comes to the self-hosting community. Yes, some instances are problematic, yes, some devs might have had problematic views. But it doesn’t really matter when it’s federated and FOSS. I think it’s clear-cut that the selfhosting community on Lemmy is a perfect alternative to reddit. Why is there such a negative bias?

  • r00ty@kbin.life
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    Pretty sure that’s only true about Lemmy. There are other threadiverse apps. The mistake is people calling the threadiverse lemmy.

    • FundMECFSResearch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yep, though the alternatives are not quite there yet software wise, but MBin and Piefed aren’t that far behind…

      • r00ty@kbin.life
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m on a pretty old version of mbin (I have some modifications I made for federation issues back when it was kbin). I need to spend a weekend to pilot an upgrade and make sure I can run it safely live.

        But even then it’s better in some ways already and I never feel like I’m missing something from lemmy. But I think just calling the whole thing lemmy puts off people that are seeing things through a political lens.

        • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          yep. as an mbin cheerleader, i evaluated both and kbin was better looking and perfectly functional from the start. no app required. no custom user-land css.

          but what really bothers me is the conflation of lemmy and fediverse. theyre used almost interchangeably. other platforms get lost in the discussion.