• GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      13 days ago

      Nobody is arguing the DNC isn’t out of touch.

      however the electorate isn’t much better. Cutting off their nose to spite their face.

      Nice try on the strawman though, better than some.

      • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        13 days ago

        I am not here to argue. I will not engage beyond this post no matter what is said in response because I don’t want to fight.

        What matters is policy. Real hard on the ground policy that real normal people can feel and see where they live.

        When some wonk gets on MSNBC with a spreadsheet hooting about how much better things are with grocery prices or housing costs, that doesn’t mean anything to someone who’s begging for extra shifts at work so they can make rent. Those are aggregates and averages. If the 200k-500k bracket is doing better while the 13k-45k bracket isnt, the numbers still went up. That looks better in the data. But the people at the bottom are still suffering just as much as ever. They don’t feel or see any improvement because there wasn’t any. Not for them.

        The health and performance of the stock market only matters to those on the bottom when it crashes and suddenly they’re paying more for everything. At no other point does it impact them in the slightest. Those record profits aren’t reinvested, they’re not used to reduce the strain on consumers. Its gobbled up by a few dozen shareholders. It benefits nobody else. And if an executive or CEO has the slightest semblance of a soul and wants to help consumers they’re voted out because the only responsibility is to those few dozen shareholders.

        Healthcare. The ACA was a grand achievement. They took Romneycare national. Round of applause for all involved. But its still cheaper to do some form of Universal Healthcare. That would be the easiest win in history. And everyone would feel it immediately. It would help 100,000,000 people immediately. People who have been putting off medical treatment for half their lives because of the extortionist expense would immediately seek treatment. They would seek preventative treatment and raise the overall health across the country. Obesity rates drop, drug use plummets, etc.

        Marijuana. Literally every person I know and interact with in my daily life uses it. Do you know the number one reason I’ve heard from all of them? Pain management. Again, another easy win that is supported by everyone except the ghouls who were alive when it was called “The Devil’s Lettuce” and propagandized into believing its this terrible thing.

        Hard Policy that people can feel and see in their daily lives. You can still court the comfortable liberals who care about the stock market and all that. They’ll be fine no matter who is in office. If they need an abortion it’s a weekend vacay to Zurich or somewhere. But you’re never going to hold any meaningful power again without hard policy. Because for decades now the republicans have cornered the market on grievance politics and reaction. To break through that you need something real. No more vibes based nonsense. It will not work.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          I am not here to argue. I will not engage beyond this post no matter what is said in response because I don’t want to fight.

          Screenshot_20241108-153203_Firefox

          tldr

          edit: for the downvoters, how can I take anyone seriously if they’re not going to sit and defend their opinion.

          Why would I even waste my time reading their wall of text? They might as well be screaming into the void.

          • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            They’re right. They put together a well constructed argument for his position and you simply ignored all of it.

            Harris ran a failed strategy of moving to the right and ‘business as usual’ when people want actual progressive policies that will address their material needs.

            Neoliberalism will always move to the right and normalize fascist ideology over improving the livelyhood of the working class. Progressive policies are popular with Republican voters too, that’s the correct way to fracture the Republican base into voting Democrat.

            Conceding to right-wing policies and disinformation, like on immigration, only alienates more of the Democratic base while bolstering Republican voters support for the Republican party.

            Polls on campaign messaging

            How to Win a Swing Voter in Seven Days

            “The View” Alternate Universe: Break From Biden in Interviews, Play the Hits in Ads

            Polls on policy

            How Trump and Harris Voters See America’s Role in the World

            Majority of Americans support progressive policies such as higher minimum wage, free college

            Democrats should run on the popular progressive ideas, but not the unpopular ones

            Here Are 7 ‘Left Wing’ Ideas (Almost) All Americans Can Get Behind

            Finding common ground: 109 national policy proposals with bipartisan support

            Progressive Policies Are Popular Policies

            Tim Walz’s Progressive Policies Popular With Republicans in Swing States

            I voted for Harris and told others to do so too. Doesn’t change the fact that it was her campaign strategy that was responsible for the loss of millions in voter turnout. All the evidence and polling show that running on popular progressive policies that represent a change and improve the material conditions of the American public was the right way to boost voter turnout, the fact that she instead went to the right was a calculated decision that completely failed.

            Edit: pronouns

            • Auli@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 days ago

              But the left doesn’t seem to care or are not motivated. The right has their shit together and people are voting even if they don’t agree or think everything trump has said. Where the left just seem to say oh I don’t agree with x I’m not voting. Roy vs wade is a great example they kept on pecking at it till they got it and the left bever got it into law thinking this is good enough.

              • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                12 days ago

                If by left you mean the Democratic Party I agree. It’s important to recognize that the Democratic Party is for the most part running on the platform of neoliberalism. That’s been the case since Third Way Politics. The issue is that, while the Democratic Base is progressive, the Democratic Party is instead still centered on neoliberalism.

                That’s an important distinction because neoliberalism is fundamentally at odds with progressive legislation that improves the material conditions of the American public, at the expense of capital accumulation of corporations.

                There are only a small amount of progressive Democrats within the Democratic Party, which include Bernie Sanders, AOC, and the rest of The Squad. As a whole, even the Democratic Party works against progressive policy which is exactly why we’ve been seeing this disconnect between the Party and the Base.

                Progressive policies and change can only be created and mobilized through grassroots movements. Republican policies, on the other hand, are entirely funded by corporate profits. That includes the entire manosphere, from think tanks like the Heritage Foundation to Fix News to individual conservative content creators like Ben Shapiro.

                That’s precisely why we need to organize more. Neither of the two parties have the interest of the working class at heart. Only by creating our own organization like through groups like the DSA and Unions do we have any kind of power to demand progressive policies that will improve our livelyhood and communities

          • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            13 days ago

            edit: for the downvoters, how can I take anyone seriously if they’re not going to sit and defend their opinion.

            You’re mocking someone for posting their reasoning in detail, and then getting upset when people downvote you without giving reasons. What do you want?

            • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              12 days ago

              after this I won’t respond to you because your opinion is meaningless and doesn’t deserve my attention.

              I’m mocking them because the message they introduced their opinion with is the same one above.

              • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 days ago

                I’m sorry that reading long posts is hard for you. But don’t take it out on others. You can say that it was too long without the added abrasiveness.

                And here, you’re telling me that my opinion is meaningless. Why do you do that? Almost everyone here has similar values and goals; and yet you’re lashing out at everyone, creating conflict and division. Isn’t that the opposite of what you want?

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        13 days ago

        What strawman? When is it appropriate to hold DNC leadership accountable for losing the election, again?

        • makyo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          13 days ago

          The DNC will have its come to jesus moment and maybe come to the wrong conclusions again, but it’s still patently obvious that a massive number of people will vote against their own interests regardless of the arguments anyone made.

          • crusa187@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            13 days ago

            Yeah it’s hard to vote in an informed manner with so many obstacles to education. I suspect this problem is about to get a whole lot worse unfortunately.

      • niemcycle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        Yes, the number of people on here who claim that withholding their vote to ‘punish the DNC’ and make them learn a lesson is helpful is too high. If the Democrats were going to learn their lesson, they would have done so after 2016. Believing that by not voting, they’ll affect the Democrats’ strategy doesn’t make them leftist, it makes them another flavour of liberal, who thinks establishment electoralism is a pathway to socialism.

        A much more effective solution is to organize locally, educating people on real solutions and pushing for change that way, not by blindly assuming the Democrats will reflect on their loss and run a communist candidate next time.

    • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      The electorate picked the racist rapist trump, that’s what represents America.

      To say that a political party should stray further from what the majority of Americans that stepped up to vote for is what is out of touch.

      • tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        It represents a large portion, but progressive policies are widely popular. Even in states Trump won there were votes passed to protect abortion access and increase minimum wage.

        Most people vote based on vibes, and there were no progressive or positive vibes put forward by the dems this campaign. They signaled a ‘lethal military’, tighter borders, and sought endorsements from prominent Republicans, trying to win votes that would never go to their party anyway, alienating anyone who might have believed in the genuineness of the dems as ‘progressives’.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Eh if the left are not going to bother to vote then who cares and they shouldn’t cater to them. Go more right split the vote at least those people vote. The ones who don’t don’t matter.

    • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      13 days ago

      Honestly, if they do the same things next cycle, I’ll be more inclined to vote green.

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      15 million Democrats, progressives, and independents condoned racism are at fault.

      Democratic leadership blind and dismissive of the common worker suck and are at fault.

      Both can and are true at the same damn time and Democrats and progressives all over the nation fucked us all.

      • VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        13 days ago

        Absolutely. It’s a two way street here.

        People need to stop turning on each other though. What’s done is done. The left has always been divided but right now we really need to start pulling ourselves together.

    • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      13 days ago

      Ah yes, a perfect example of what OP was talking about. Good work finding it so we can point and laugh at the people that keep looking for someone to blame for their own choices.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        56
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Yeah, and your comment is a great example of the Democrats 2024 outreach strategy: a smug, self-righteous attitude that failed to get you any votes.

        • hangman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          13 days ago

          Doesn’t make that person wrong. If you need to be properly reached to keep yourself from voting for sweet potato Hitler, I’m sorry but you only have yourself to blame

          • LadyAutumn
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            32
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            Did the commenter say they voted for Trump?

            The people who voted for Trump over Kamala are not the leftists on lemmy. I’ve actually only seen one or two people say that they’re going to vote for Trump for some leftist reason. The majority of people said they would vote for her anyway, and a minority of people said they were abstaining.

            You sound really foolish mischaracterizing your opponents. The democratic party failed. Kamala Harris failed. There was no sabotage. She campaigned a conservative platform of military, border control, unwavering support for Israel and said she was going to maintain the status quo. When asked what she would do differently from Biden her gut response was “nothing”. It was a spectacular failure and highlights every single way that the democratic party has entirely lost touch with reality.

            Cost of living has tripled in the last 4 years. Now try telling white working class straight people who weren’t living paycheck to paycheck 4 years ago that you’re going to do everything the same as the guy that came before you. The same guy who broke up the rail workers strikes. No, us trying to explain fascism or project 2025 to them did literally nothing. They don’t understand it and don’t care. They know that their financial situation got worse and that the democratic candidate said they wouldn’t change anything. That’s all they understood. They don’t know what’s fact or what’s fiction, and they think Trump is a brilliant businessman. It doesn’t matter that he’s not if they all think he is.

            The DNC failed. Stop trying to defend them for God’s sake. How are they ever going to actually pose a challenge to far right populism or fascism if you relentlessly defend them from all criticism?

            • hangman@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              Woah chief, I’m not defending anybody and I didn’t ask who anybody voted for. If you can read then you see what I said is exactly what I meant: if you voted for sweet potato Hitler you only have urself to blame, not the democrats. And if you need someone to “reach you” properly in order to not vote for sweet potato Hitler you only have yourself to blame

              The democrats fucked this up big time, but I’m not going to blame them for the fact that people are too stupid to not vote for the end of our way of life. That’s a personal responsibility that 70 million Americans failed at

              • LadyAutumn
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                edit-2
                13 days ago

                I read that sweet potato line as implying that the commenter themselves had voted for him, my bad.

                I do agree that every human being has a duty to not vote for Hitler. I mean, that was supposed to be the point of the post world War 2 Western education system. Didn’t work out for a lot of reasons.

                But I also believe that many people don’t understand what “voting for Hitler” even means or that Trump poses a threat to them. They don’t understand politics. They don’t understand the way the capitalist economic system functions. They think of it as some ethereal force that gets worse when you control it and gets better when you don’t. They think rich people are brilliant geniuses who have divine knowledge of the economy that allowed them to become so rich. They don’t get it. The political strategy of progressives has to account for that. The democratic party isn’t a party of progressives. It’s a party with a minority of progressives in it, but beyond them, it is the party of the status quo. The status quo has gotten worse, that much people do understand. And they chose the guy who said he was going to change it. He said he’ll fix it and they believed him.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            13 days ago

            And if you’re a politician and people don’t vote for you, you have no one but yourself to blame. I wish Harris hadn’t run a dogshit campaign, but she did, and I’m not gonna blame voters because she was bad at her job.

            • hangman@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              13 days ago

              You’re entitled to your opinion but I’ll readily blame people who vote for a wannabe facist dictator

              People are responsible for their own votes

              • harmsy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                12 days ago

                There’s nothing wrong with blaming them, but we still need to figure out how to get their lazy asses into the booths in 2026, 2028, and beyond.

            • Auli@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 days ago

              It’s funny how when she losses it’s a dog shit campaign but nobody was saying that before the election.

              • pjwestin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                12 days ago

                Just because you’re not aware of something, doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. There wetr plenty of people in the media who said the same thing. Hell, you can go through my post history and see how many times I said, “seems like she needs to shift her stance on Gaza,” or, “why the fuck is she campaigning with Liz Cheney?” before the election.

        • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          This is voting for your own best interests as a part of a country.

          What kind of fool believes that is supposed to require outreach? Would you rather visit an inept doctor because they make you feel more like a big boy by courting your feelings?

          If voters must have outreach to not show up, that means they see no difference in their own life between the candidates.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 days ago

            I don’t know what to tell you man, you need to get people excited to go vote for you, otherwise they don’t show up. It’s election 101. Harris didn’t do that for her base, so she fucking lost. You can bitch about voters all you want, but it’s not gonna change reality, so maybe that time would be better spent figuring out why they didn’t show up. Again, I’d start with the fact that she ignored her base for the fucking Cheneys.

            • CasualPenguin@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 days ago

              I understand where you’re coming from but I think there is an atmosphere tinging the conversation (and there are a lot of threads happening so maybe I’m the one doing that, not trying to be perfect here)

              I’m not bitching about voters. I’m saying people are blaming Democrats, or Harris, or whoever they want to, but one side showed up with more people. I see you are continuing that as well by saying she ignored her own base.

              More people showed up for what Trump was selling. Harris was certainly not ignoring her base in favor of the Cheneys but I think you mean they relatively to your expectations (?).

              If she were leaning more right, then I guess that was the correct choice because that’s who showed up to vote.

              • pjwestin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 days ago

                I think she did ignore her base, mainly the working class. It’s not just that she campaigned with Cheney and stuck to hard-right positions on Gaza and the border, but her economic message was entirely about opportunity for the middle-class class. Her working-class message had a few good features, like grocery price controls, but they were small measures shunted to the sidelines. It wasn’t a broad economic message like BBB.

                The campaign was predicated on a series of incorrect assumptions on who would vote for her. Women? They’ll vote for me because of abortion. Muslims? They’ll vote for me because Trump is worse. Working class? They always go Democrat, I don’t need a strong economic message. PoC? C’mon, like they’ll flip for Trump. Wow, we’ve got so many demographics on lockdown, we should try and flip some conservatives! It’s not like my constituents will be so unenthused by my campaign that they won’t bother to come out.

    • Lightor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 days ago

      This, this was the real problem. Something like 5% of registered Republicans voted for her. Dems usually win the popular vote. There are enough of them to win this, but they choose to alienate them.

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    13 days ago

    Harris ran a perfect campaign. If she was running as a (pre-Trump) republican. However, we know that:

    1. She isn’t a Republican
    2. She banked on pulling in republican voters, instead of rallying her base
    3. Republicans will almost always vote for the R instead of policy
    4. She backed off of every single progressive idea she started with
    5. She trotted out establishment Democrats to lecture the electorate instead of inspire them
    6. Tlaib pulled twice the numbers as Harris as the only anti-genocide Palestinian in Congress

    It’s Harris and the Democrats. Should people have voted? Yes. Is it understandable why people didn’t want to vote for the person telling them that she’ll be a good republican and support a genocide? Also yes.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      13 days ago

      You’re only providing half of the argument. The other half of the argument is the fact that if you didn’t support her, then you supported a fascist dictatorship.

      And what happened? We got a fascist dictatorship!

      • Gorillazrule@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        13 days ago

        Let’s preface with the fact I voted for Harris, and understand where you’re coming from with lesser evil voting.

        But the other half of your argument is that with the way that Harris was tacking to the right to try to gain moderate voters, the choice was between voting between fascism now and fascism later down the line.

        But if we vote for fascism later then we have time to distance ourselves from fascism.

        By sitting at home happy that you did your job and ‘defeated’ fascism, until the next election where your choice is again fascism now and fascism a little less later down the line?

        As the Dems keep drifting further and further right. At what point do you put your foot down and demand actual progressive policies? And how do you get those demands to actually be listened to when the party knows you’ll vote for them because “at least we’re not as bad as the other guys. What choice do you have?” Supporting her is a message to the Democratic party that their strategy of slowly becoming more conservative wins elections. And this is the reason that I was very conflicted about voting for her, but just held my nose and did it for the greater good.

        • MonkRome@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          I think you’re wrong about how the party sees non voters. When you don’t vote, the party treats you like a non voter and moves their platform to the right to appeal to the voters. When you sit home in an election the party doesn’t go “how do we get these votes of people that only vote when the stars align perfectly”, they go, “how do we get these votes of people that always vote”. Every far left person mad about the country moving right can blame themselves just as much as the party. People who consistently participate shape the future.

          Source: I’ve worked for the Democratic party and have a pretty good idea how they interpret voter turnout data.

          • seeking_perhaps@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            Out of curiosity, how do they interpret 3rd party left-leaning votes, particularly in swing states? Obviously those wouldn’t have decided this election, just curious since you seem to be in the know.

            • MonkRome@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 days ago

              If I understand their outlook, first job is getting people who consistently vote for Dems to be reminded and motivated to go to the polls. 2nd is convincing consistent voters to vote for you (that includes Republicans and third party), a distant last is convincing non-voters or occasional voters. I think the problem with trying to get 3rd party voters to vote for Dems is that the type of person that votes 3rd party is very difficult to convince that you’re an ally.

              They could completely realign the party platform to fit with 3rd party and non voters biggest issues and most won’t shift their vote for many reasons. Disgust for the 2 party system, distrust that the party will follow a more left wing agenda, conspiracy theories, the needs to be contrarian or protect their sense of moral purity, etc.

              While I’m not sure I agree with the parties approach to disaffected voters. I do think the amount of investment needed to get those voters is possibly outweighed by the amount of voters you may lose in the process. And that sense of inherent risk is stopping the party from taking a chance. Maybe we get lucky and they no longer see an alternative, but I doubt it.

    • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      13 days ago

      I didn’t realize a wealth tax, 25k credit for first time home buyers, support for legalized cannabis, support for trans people, etc were Republican policies.

      Are there more things on my progressive checklist? Yes, definitely. Universal healthcare, for one.

      Part of being an adult is not being able to get everything you want when you want it.

      Part of politics in the US is understanding that some of those things that Harris supported which resulted in a candidate that was not far left enough to get progressives off the couch, are too far left for other voters.

      I don’t envy whoever is picking up the pieces at the DNC and trying to determine what the precise amount of leftism is that will get those 10-15 million leftists off the couch without alienating the 60-70 million that did show up.

      This is especially true for the Palestine issue. How many of those 10-15 million watching from the sidelines would have shown up for a pro-Palestine candidate? Even if it was 10 million, there would still have been more who would sit this one out or vote Trump, because they’d believe the bullshit that the Palestinians are all terrorists. I truly wish it wasn’t the case, but I fear the post-911 Islamophobia and the imperialist attitudes about support for Israel would have cost a pro-Palestine candidate more votes than they would have gained.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        13 days ago

        a wealth tax

        Did she actually campaign on this, or was it just some white paper she had on her website? There’s a difference between having a policy that you are campaigning on and actually intend to carry out and some vague policy paper a staffer wrote.

        25k credit for first time home buyers This was an absolute embarrassment of a policy. Did you see the requirements on it? They presented it as a typical neoliberal bullshit policy. It was filled with so many specific requirements that almost no one would qualify for it. And it was bad economic policy too, as it would simply serve to further inflate the overheated housing bubble.

        support for legalized cannabis

        You cannot run on something that is one of your severe policy failures. Democrats have been running on the cannabis issue for multiple cycles at this point. They’ve all dragged their feet and slow-walked it for cheap political points.

        support for trans people

        She’s objectively better on this than Trump, but trying to Third Way it, she screwed herself over. Democrats were vocally supportive of trans rights before any kind of major backlash emerged, but their support was only ever skin-deep. Trans issues were largely absent from the recent DNC.

        The Republicans latched onto anti-trans bigotry as one of their major campaign planks, and the Democrats responded by just trying to ignore trans people entirely. They avoided discussing trans people whenever possible, and they never came up with effective responses to Republicans’ main attack points. If you actually believe in trans rights, the correct response to the charge of “you want men in women sports!” is to say, “well trans women aren’t men, and you shouldn’t moronically assume trans women have the same athletic advantages as cis men.” If you actually believe in trans rights and equality, you would say, “the differences between men and women sports performance is almost entirely due to testosterone. Any minor differences that remain are not worth discriminating against people over.” Etc. You know, actually RESPONDING TO and REBUTTING the attacks Republicans make against trans people.

        Centrist democrats showed conclusively that their support for trans people was nothing more than shallow political pandering. The Biden administration hasn’t been using all the levers of federal power to protect trans kids from their state governments.

        This kind of mealy-mouthed centrism is what cost Kamala the election. She isn’t an enemy of trans people, but she’s also not a real ally. She doesn’t want to actively harm trans people, but she doesn’t have some fundamental belief in the worth of trans rights. It’s just another political football to her. It was beneficial to seem extremely pro-trans in 2020, and now that the conservatives have rallied against trans people, now she’s not so eager to defend trans people. It seems disingenuous and it made her look like someone who would say anything just to win the election.

        How many of those 10-15 million watching from the sidelines would have shown up for a pro-Palestine candidate?

        No one was expecting her to become a rabidly pro-Palestinian protester. No one expected her to get up at the podium and say, “actually, Hamas did nothing wrong, and the Israelis should be relocated out of Palestine.” People wanted her to make US military aid contingent on Israel meeting human rights guidelines. Israel, despite all the precision weaponry we give them, has a worse civilian:military kill ratio than Hamas. They kill more civilians for every soldier they kill than radical terrorists. Despite all their high-tech weaponry, THAT is how unconcerned Israel has been about civilian casualties. Hamas has done a better job of avoiding civilian casualties than Israel.

        Anyway, the polling showed that calling for a cease-fire and other measures would have been immensely popular. This was a completely unforced error on her part. She threw away votes for nothing.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        I’m not saying that she didn’t have any liberal centrist ideas like what you listed, but that doesn’t mean she was progressive either. A lot of the policy ideas that were actually good were once on the Republican platform before Reagan.

        Don’t forget about how popular Bernie was in 2016 before he was forcibly removed from the democratic nomination by the party establishment or how popular Tlaib, AOC, and Omar have been. Don’t forget about how down-ballot races in this cycle, while brutal to Democrats, didn’t push out many progressives. Progressivism is far more popular than the democratic party is willing to admit or fight on, because the party is owned and controlled by the same class currently oppressing us; the billionaires. If a candidate like Bernie presents a real path, they will force the person out. It’s not strictly an issue with the Overton window.

        Here’s the thing about the choice facing people in the election: it doesn’t matter anymore as a matter of the current political reality, because Harris gambled hard on the “good cop, bad cop” aspect of “he’s worse” and lost hard. That statement is 110% true, but it’s horribly ineffective as we saw in 2016 and again in this election. Islamophobia will absolutely increase, and Trump will fund the genocide until all of Palestine is settled by colonists. But once again, don’t forget about how successful Tlaib was in comparison to Harris. We no longer have the opportunity to find out if it would or wouldn’t have affected the campaign, but the indication is there that at least 1 swing state would have gone to Harris with an anti-genocide stance.

  • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    13 days ago

    Way more than two options here.

    I voted for Harris, and I encouraged others to as well. And I think the Democratic leadership royally fucked up here.

    The polls kinda sucked in the end, and I think one reason is that folks were embarrassed to admit they were voting for Trump. That to me says that they voted for him not because he’s a racist sexist pig, but in spite of this.

    But the polls did afaik get that the economy was hugely important. And the Democrats failed here both in current policy (groceries got more expensive over the course of Biden’s term), and in proposed policy messaging. No one cares about home buyer credits if you can’t afford groceries. (And no, I don’t think Trump has a plan to lower prices aside from shady back room deals that will ultimately cost us big — but voters want something new…)

    To be clear, I voted for Biden, I voted for Harris, and I’m pretty scared about the future. But the Democrats need to learn something from this or it’s same story in four years. Maybe the lesson is “we can’t count on the left in this country to vote for us by default,” and maybe the lesson is, “for the love of God raise hell if the cost of living goes up, and do it in a way that appeals to the lowest common denominator.”

    • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      13 days ago

      I keep hearing about grocery prices, but no one has any explanation of what Biden was supposed to do about it that he wasn’t already doing, or how Trump will handle it better.

      If putting a Republican administration in place that will bend over for corporations causes lower grocery prices, doesn’t that just prove that corporate greed was the main driver all along? Why can’t people who voted Trump for these reasons understand that?

      If voters keep voting like this, corporations are just going to purposely raise prices whenever someone they don’t like is in power, and the sheep will just fall for it and we’ll never be able to hold these corporations accountable.

      • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        I keep hearing about grocery prices, but no one has any explanation of what Biden was supposed to do about it that he wasn’t already doing, or how Trump will handle it better.

        Completely agree. I think it’s a “you break it you buy it” situation with voters.

        And it’s not based in reason — Biden’s administration was staring down the barrel of a recession, and yet here we are, having completely avoided it. That’s a pretty successful navigation of the economic hand that Biden was dealt, if you ask me. But at the end of the day “groceries more expensive” = “we need someone else in the white house” for a lot of voters, I guess.

        • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          13 days ago

          I was a naysayer in 2020, I thought the DNC was repeating the mistakes of 2016 by putting up a moderate but I was wrong.

          I was practically giddy when I heard that the FTC was finally going after these corporations.

          I was thinking that there’s no way they can blame the Dems for what happens in the next two years, but I’m guessing the post-reality anti-facts crew will find a way.

          • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            they were wrong in 2020. there is a reason biden ‘promised to be a single term president’ initially and then immediately retracted once he won.

            The problem wasnt biden’s economic policies during his term. its that he (and harris) demonstrated an profound lack of understanding of the daily experience of working americans. those 20 million people are likely individuals who have mentally checked out from politics because its not worth their time anymore due to the parties being essentially identical economically. As I’m going to do outside of my local elections going forward. its just not worth it anymore to try and support the dems.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      I agree, the Democrats should learn something. Unfortunately, they won’t be able to do anything about it again considering Trump won’t never leave office as long as he lives.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        They’re screwed either way the Supreme Court is going to be so stacked on the republican side. They well control everything even if the dems have a president in.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          If those 20 million voters actually voted I have the distinct feeling that we would have had a very weak, but still there, blue wave.

          But we’ll never know now.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    13 days ago

    Two things can be true at once.

    Everyone who didn’t vote, voted third party or for Trump, or encouraged others to do the same, supported fascism coming into power in this country.

    Harris failed her country when it needed her, specifically, most; and the Dem leadership in general failed the country grotesquely in the same manner.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      12 days ago

      why are y’all scared of taking responsibility for allowing a Nazi to gain power when you decided to not vote?

      the DNC is out of touch with voters.

      that doesn’t absolve the electorate from failing to rally behind a candidate that was the best choice to stop a NAZI REGIME from taking power.

      if you didn’t vote, or voted 3rd party, you’re no better than magats.

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        12 days ago

        why are y’all scared of taking responsibility for allowing a Nazi to gain power when you decided to not vote

        I voted for Kamala but I still blame the DNC

        the issue is two fold

        a) they played games with democracy, further accelerating the erosion of whatever little faith remains in our democracy institutions. there should have been a primary, not the underhanded switcharoo we got to witness where for the first time in US history since primaries were a thing… we had a presidential candidate nominated without a single vote

        b) while voters are struggling and going through a period of profound insecurity - not only financially but in a very real social sense - they offer more of the same. neoliberal status quo. people are desperate for change and the DNC offers them nothing.

        you blame the voters but you do not want to put an ounce of blame on the party that would rather lose an election than offer meaningful change

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          12 days ago

          and installing a Nazi regime that has, on record, stated they will never let go of control is the best answer y’all could come up with?

          how is any of that going to make the struggle BETTER?

          will unbridled fascism help calm the masses and stabilize the inequalities of the previous democracy?

          will it restore and protect the rights of Americans?

          you blame the voters but you do not want to put an ounce of blame on the party that would rather lose an election than offer meaningful change

          I blame the DNC of being inept! I never fucking said they weren’t!

          I can still blame the electorate for allowing a fascist dictatorship to take hold in American government.

          Just because you call out a fault doesn’t absolve the other party, both are at fault here. I’m just disappointed that voters ignored all reason and decided to fuck all of us(including themselves), to spite us.

          btw, what kind of “meaningful change” can we expect now that sweet potato Hitler is in power?

          • weeeeum@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 days ago

            Voting for a Nazi won’t make things better, but when people are desperate they want change, any change. Weimar Germany was democratic, Hitler and the Nazi party legitimately won the popular vote.

        • brianary@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          you blame the voters but you do not want to put an ounce of blame on the party that would rather lose an election than offer meaningful change

          Uh…

          the DNC is out of touch with voters.

          What is this, if not shared blame?

          • kava@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            i guess the implication is that he puts more blame on the voters, as that is what his comments are mainly focused on.

            me personally I don’t blame the voters at all. just like I don’t blame the German public for voting in the Nazis.

            humans are stupid herd animals who will elect strongmen when they feel weak and scared.

            i believe you can only put blame on people that have autonomy. and the only people with any real autonomy in this country are the elites, which have stuck their fingers in their ears and their heads in the sand for far too long.

            the pressure pot is cooking and I think it’s too late to stop it. maybe if we were a little less greedy over the last few decades and a little less focused on the short term, we could have skipped this resurgence of fascism that we’re about to live through

            but politicians only care about the next election and corporations only care about the next quarter. we are a short term society and have sacrificed the long term health of our country

            • brianary@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 days ago

              Interesting. That’s an angle I’ll have to consider. It seems like democracy with fixed terms and term limits has a similar problem to capitalism: myopia.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          12 days ago

          Makes me feel better.

          I guess we’ve got, what, the next 80 years to blame each other until the Nazis kill us all?

      • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 days ago

        The blame falls on people in power not delivering for the working class/poor. There is no better ally for the GOP than modern spineless Dems who center their politics around them. Every third party voter could have voted for Harris and she still would have lost.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          12 days ago

          The blame falls on people in power not delivering for the working class/poor.

          No, I’m pretty sure it was the people who refused to vote. All 20 million of them failed to identify the obvious threat to our democracy and react accordingly.

          There is no better ally for the GOP than modern spineless Dems who center their politics around them.

          Spoken like a true extremist. Now, the sad thing is, I never considered myself a Democrat. I was something of a hybrid between leftist and Democrat. After this election though, I’m neither. Now I’m an anti-extremist, extremist. And I know I’m not the only one.

          Every third party voter could have voted for Harris and she still would have lost.

          We all know that’s a lie. 20 million votes to Harris would have swung it greatly in her favor.

          But that’s fine. You keep lying, and I’ll keep hating extremists.

          • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Cope all you want. But she made the choice to court Republicans and chase the ghosts of Cheney Era Voters and paid for it. When Trump can position himself as to speaking to working class issues than a Dem.

            " hybrid between leftist and Democrat" Yeah a centrists no need to rebrand it.

                • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  12 days ago

                  You seem to have confused me for somebody who gives a fuck about the DNC.

                  I couldn’t give a fucking rat ass about the DNC, the RNC, Independents, Green Party, Tea Party.

                  I only care that there are Nazis taking over the United States of America in January. I care that 125 to 200 million Americans will pay the price for the negligence of 20 million Americans.

                  I don’t judge you based off of what your political leaning is.

                  I judge you based on if you are a fascist supporting boot licking Nazi loving piece of shit.

                  If you didn’t vote this election cycle, you’re as good as a fucking Nazi to me. If you voted third party, you’re as good as a fucking Nazi to me. If you voted Republican, you are a fucking Nazi to me.

                  Please, by all means, vote however you want. Vote your conscience. But I’ll still think you’re a Nazi if you didn’t vote for Harris.

                  Not because you are a Nazi, but because you didn’t actually try to stop the Nazis.

        • brianary@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          I don’t understand the “we were to small to matter” argument I’ve been seeing. If that’s true, why on Earth would you expect to matter enough to move the Democratic platform, or to shape society after leftists “burn it all down” (whatever that means)?

      • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        12 days ago

        Should the DNC have put forward a candidate that was fairly selected with grass roots support among the wider voting population?

        No, it’s the voters who are at fault.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          12 days ago

          do you think there was enough time?

          use your fucking brain.

          Americans that purposely withheld votes cause this to happen. point. fucking. blank.

          when it actually mattered 20 million Americans abandoned their posts to protect democracy. full stop.

          when a house is on fire, do you save the stuff or the people first?

          Nevermind, you just want to blame the fire dept from not showing up faster.

          • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            12 days ago

            do you think there was enough time?

            Yes. Other countries manage just fine.

            Americans that purposely withheld votes cause this to happen. point. fucking. blank.

            Maybe they didn’t purposely withhold votes. Maybe they were just not enthusiastic enough about the DNC candidate.

            20 million Americans abandoned their posts to protect democracy

            This is not democracy. It’s a corporatocracy that’s one candidate away from dictatorship.

            when a house is on fire, do you save the stuff or the people first

            The house is on fire because the two greedy landlords have refused to do basic maintenance and listen to the concerns of their tenants.

            • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              12 days ago

              You just don’t get it. You still want to argue about why the house is on fire, instead of trying to save the people in the house.

              That’s the problem with ideological extremists. You just can’t admit that your idea sucks.

              I’ll admit that the Democrats suck.

              Can you admit that your socialist goals were unachievable in the previous political environment?

              Wait a second. 🤔 Was that your goal all along?

              No, if that was the case, you would be no better than the Nazis.

              right?

              • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                If the house wasn’t on fire we wouldn’t need to save the people. Your strategy will never save the people in the house. Neither landlord cares about the people, only the companies providing services.

                • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  again, you’re trying argue about if or how the house is on fire.

                  it was on fire!

                  now it’s burned the-fuck down. People, things, everything has burned.

                  it’s too late.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          and voters failed at their job. they failed to recognize trump as a fascist and a direct threat to the continuation of our Republic.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      I blame both groups. Both groups are known to be stubborn to the point of short sightedness. Lemmy has a lot of blaming of both at the moment and it’s fair

  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    13 days ago

    Ah, yes. All of you *checks notes* 4.5 million eligible lemmy users who abstained should be ashamed of themselves. /s

    • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      I keep reading all this finger pointing from people that actively spoke against voting for Harris.

      Maybe those who didn’t vote abstained shouldn’t be allowed to complain.

      • crusa187@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        13 days ago

        I voted for Walz.

        Dems suck at winning elections because for 40 years now their strategy has been a losing one of “try being Republican-light.” They’re too corrupted by corporate bribes to right the ship, hopefully it sinks into a sea of conservative ignorance and an actual leftist party can rise from the ashes.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          13 days ago

          The more right the US shifts, the more it will be controlled by money over masses. Unless by “rise from the ashes” you actually expect a successful overthrow of the US government by a people’s revolution which is pretty laughable in this polarized nation.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            13 days ago

            The more right the US shifts, the more it will be controlled by money over masses.

            I’m curious as to why did you made this statement. Like do you think the US isn’t already fully “controlled by money over masses”?

            I legitimately don’t understand what people think America is as a country. All I see everywhere I go in this country is an orgiastic celebration of material wealth and those who have it over all else.

            We’ve been controlled by “money over masses” my entire existence. I seriously have zero understanding of what online leftists are even talking about when they talk about solidarity and community. I’ve lived in many different places here and I felt the same sense of individualism and capital above all else everywhere I’ve been.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              I’m not saying money doesn’t control politics when Democrats hold office. I’m saying Democrats do more for the masses than Republicans, especially the Republicans that are coming next year. Trump and his cronies are very vocal about having already been sold to the highest bidder.

          • crusa187@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 days ago

            That would be cool, but I meant more metaphorically. Other parties have come and gone in the history of the US - now is a great time for an actual populist party to rise up and win voters from all political spectra. It isn’t just Dems who are feeling disenfranchised, and a large enough movement could pierce through the media bubbles on both sides to gain momentum.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              13 days ago

              It’s feasible, albeit pretty idealistic. I’d love to see it happen, but I’m a bit skeptical that the billionaire-owned media will support honest reporting of a candidate that threatens their power.

              • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                13 days ago

                I’m a bit skeptical that the billionaire-owned media will support honest reporting of a candidate that threatens their power.

                I 100% share in your skepticism.

                This is where a lot of the online talk about “the DNC” gets me. Like sure, the DNC wants their preferred candidate as an organizing body I’m sure, but the media did everything it could to keep Bernie from winning the nomination as well. I remember people on MSNBC of all places talking about how dangerous nominating Bernie Sanders would be.

                They attack it in straightforward ways (calling them “communists”, “socialists”, “Marxists”) in more republican-leaning media, and they attack it in other, less straightforward means in other type of media (calling the plans “stupid”, saying that they’ll “never work” that we “don’t have the money”, or “it’ll cost more in taxes!”).

                I just don’t see it at all. I wish I was more hopeful about this stuff but with the individualistic behavior of the American populace, the mass media landscape, and the way the Internet has been sculpted into something palatable or even usable by the oligarchs to get what they want (perhaps even more cheaply than it was in traditional media) I just don’t believe it is possible to win with some “better message”.

                The only thing I could see saving this country is a groundswell of old-style civic behavior where people largely tune out or drop off from mass media and social media and start connecting with their neighbors and building actual community. I am not optimistic about that either.

        • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 days ago

          They’re too corrupted by corporate bribes to right the ship, hopefully it sinks into a sea of conservative ignorance and an actual leftist party can rise from the ashes.

          And you know what’s really sad about this? They don’t even have to be! Kamala massively outspent Trump. One thing the DNC refuses to learn is that there is such a thing as saturation in campaign messaging. Past a point, past a certain number of commercials, flyers, mailer, door-hangers, text messages, and on and on? At some point it just stops working. At some point you just start annoying people. Hillary massively outspent Trump in 2016, and Kamala massively outspent Trump in 2024. It didn’t matter. Most of those dollars were completely wasted showing ads to voters that were already completely over-saturated with ads.

          Maybe you need corporate money for the type of wasteful campaign Kamala ran, but it’s not like she didn’t also raise millions and millions in individual donations. Even in the era of big money politics, it is entirely possible to bring in enough small donations to run a presidential campaign. All that corporate money that Kamala sold her soul for was ultimately spent preaching to the choir or trying to reach the unreachable.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          No your just going to go further right as a country and all the special leftist that stayed home we’ll cry how did this happen.

          • crusa187@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            I think those leftists who abstained from voting know how this happened, and I’ll give them credit for having principles in a time where principle is severely lacking. Either way, you’re wrong to blame them - Kamala could have won every last one of those votes if she denounced the genocide perpetrated by Israel and announced plans for an arms embargo as soon as she took office, but that was too much to ask for a politician thoroughly corrupted by AIPAC money. The blame squarely lies with DNC leadership for losing yet another election in spectacular fashion.

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 days ago

        I keep reading all this finger pointing from people that actively spoke against voting for Harris.

        I think that’s just your confirmation bias talking

        Maybe those who didn’t vote shouldn’t be allowed to complain.

        I’ll tell all the convicts, LGBTQ children and… every non-US citizen who’s going to suffer through another Trump term.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          Be realistic. I’m being critical of eligible citizens who chose not to vote.

          Excellent job modeling both gaslighting and a strawman in the same pointless criticism, btw.

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 days ago

            I’m being critical of eligible citizens who chose not to vote.

            That’s not what your overgeneralising comment suggests.

            Excellent job modeling both gaslighting and a strawman in the same pointless criticism, btw.

            I’m not sure you know what these terms mean.

            • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              Fair point. I’ve edited my initial comment to address abstainers.

              As for my grasp on vocabulary:

              gaslighting: to psychologically manipulate (someone) usually over time so that the victim experiences doubts about their own emotional or mental stability

              Exhibited in your suggestion that conformation bias is clouding my ability to read.

              strawman: an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent’s real argument.

              Demonstrated by your argument redirecting the focus to those who are ineligible to vote.

              Ready to try again? Although you may have a better chance of convincing someone less literate.

              • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                13 days ago

                Exhibited in your suggestion that conformation bias is clouding my ability to read.

                Sorry, that’s not gaslighting. I was suggesting that your confirmation bias makes you cherrypick non-voters among all the people criticizing the Dems. It’s simply absurd to claim that only abstainers criticize the Dems. I did not try to manipulate you.

                Demonstrated by your argument redirecting the focus to those who are ineligible to vote.

                You said that “those who didn’t vote shouldn’t be allowed to complain”. I felt included, since I didn’t -ote, but I’m not a US citizen. Refusing to steelman your point does not equal strawmanning.

                Ready to try again? Although, you may have a better chance of convincing someone less literate.

                I’m trembling, when thinking of your literacy. /s 🙄

                Stop telling me how great your farts smell.

                • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 days ago

                  I see. So you believe it’s not manipulative to attempt to discredit another’s opinion by repeatedly distracting from their point using well-known bad arguments, all without supporting your own opinion?

                  It’s no wonder Trump won.

  • Davin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    12 days ago

    I think it was both playing chicken against each other. Dem leadership refused to listen to “progressives”, I E.: things that most Americans wanted, and the voters refused to vote until the Dems listened to them.

    So they crashed into each other and now the country is going to burn down.

        • KidNamedLainah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 days ago

          The best example is the minimum wage increase in Missouri that recently got put into law. Sinema killed the federal bill a few years ago but somehow deep, red state Americans are not progressive? People love progressive policies, they just don’t like the words associated with it.

      • weeeeum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        American politicians are not progressive. America has not had a true progressive in decades. Today’s democrat policy has been overwhelmingly stagnant. Status quo plus a tiny tax cut for the working class.

        The millions of Democrats who didn’t vote shows a rapidly growing apathy towards the party and their inaction

        • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          They had Bernie, but they backstabbed him in two primaries, to please the corporate donors. And maybe there’s the squad, at least two of them are still around.

      • Davin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        That’s kind of a difficult thing to determine, when asked almost no one says they are, but if asked about policies, they tend to go for more progressive policies, even people that identify as conservatives will agree with more progressive policies. The people they vote for however, are definitely not progressive… Mostly, there are a few.

        Then again, progressive in America is pretty much basic human rights and protecting vulnerable people which should be the minimum.

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Exactly this. Americans don’t care about progress, they don’t even care about human rights. They care about the economy. Clinton was right, “it’s the economy stupid”.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    13 days ago

    Yes you should have voted for Kamala and yes it’s the Democrats at fault. Both are true.

    • DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Yup. They fucked us royally and I’m sort of waiting to see if people organize around this. The DNC needs to go. They’ve known about Trump since 16 and this is the campaign they run? They’re trying to elect him at this point, I don’t know what else to think.

      Democrats: here’s a rock and two nickels

      Republicans: here’s everything you’ve ever wanted and all the libertarian shit you used to jerk off to.

      Liberals after the election: how did we lose??

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        Republicans: here’s everything you’ve ever wanted and all the libertarian shit you used to jerk off to.

        “But I know that he won’t really give them that, and if they’re stupid enough to believe that, we don’t need their votes anyway”

        ~Every Democrat I’ve argued with since Tuesday

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Lmao ditto

      Anyone saying that it isn’t the Democrats’ fault is delusional. To win elections, you have to win favor with more people than the opposition, and Democrats failed to do that

      Every argument I’ve been in since Tuesday has basically boiled down to “we didn’t try to get more votes because we shouldn’t have to”

      • Knightfox@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        I don’t know, at this point I’m starting to ask myself if it’s the Democrats fault if the majority of the people agree with the opposition? If she had won the popular vote and lost the electoral college I might have believed that it was simply appealing more to the Democratic base or appealing to less enfranchised liberals, but she lost the popular vote by a long shot. Not only did she lose, but she lost after the other guy has had 4 years of public attack, federal crimes, rape convictions, Project 2025, and basically promising that Palestinians and Ukrainians will get fucked. Hell, the percentage of women that voted for Trump went up in this election.

        If people didn’t turn out because Democrats aren’t appealing to leftist ideals enough I fear the message heard by the DNC isn’t to appeal to even more progressive or socialist ideals, but to adopt even more moderate policies. Just facing the facts, but the political left is an unreliable voter group and it’s extremely entitled. Instead of trying to be a foil to Republican ideals Democrats are more likely to try more moderate options. Think of it as creating an alternative instead of being an opposite, Coke and Pepsi instead of Coke and Sprite. It feels like the needle of America’s social equilibrium has permanently moved to be more conservative.

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          12 days ago

          I think the problem is that Harris was barely appealing to any ideals. If she had run hard on medicare for all and raising the minimum wage, I think she might have gotten the popular vote. Instead, she promised more of the same that we’ve had for the last 4 years.

          • Knightfox@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            Eh, I’ll concede that she wasn’t screaming her ideals as loud as possible, but that goes back to my original point. The political left is a fickle voter base. Kamala had good ideas, she had policies, she had been part of the successes made under Biden, but she put most of her focus into attacking Trump. It sounds like the argument being made is that uninformed voters weren’t encouraged enough to vote and more liberal disenfranchised voters didn’t turn out because they didn’t like her policies. If this is the case which makes more sense:

            1.) Making some policy changes so they can get people who don’t historically come out to vote to do so or,

            2.) Making some policy changes so that people who historically come out to vote will vote for them.

            Someone threatening not to vote, when they historically don’t anyways, isn’t much of a threat or motivation.

  • Stern@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    13 days ago

    “I can’t just run on not being the other guy? I actually have to articulate a platform and get people to like me???”

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    13 days ago

    Give and Take. It doesn’t matter. You aren’t selling shit if you aren’t offering what the people want. They wanted a rock to throw in a glass house and Trump promised to be that rock, not the Democrats. Yet, they will never learn this lesson.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 days ago

      lets teach through parable.

      A drifter has been walking through a desert for five days without water. if he doesn’t get water in the next hour he will die. he happens upon a small oasis.

      the drifter rushes to find water and all he sees is:

      • a small murky puddle covered in muck and grime
      • a bucket of watery shit
      • a camel
      • a dried out corpse

      he looks at his options and is debating which would be better. he starts to move towards the puddle to drink from it when suddenly the camel begins to relieve itself.

      he stops to consider drinking the urine.

      you are the drifter. the shit bucket is trump. the puddle is kamala. the piss is stein. the corpse is the abstained voter.

      which would you have chosen?

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        13 days ago

        The choice is obvious, we eat the sand in hopes it will quench our thirst. Thats basically what we did.

      • miak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        A murky pond of still water might not be a good choice no matter how thirsty you are. The bacteria in it could kill you. If you’re thirsty and lost at sea, I hope you won’t drink the salt water. That’s the issue with the insistance that people should vote for Harris “to stop trump”. It’s short sighted and does nothing to address the long-term problem of, election after election, being presented two shitty options and told it’s critical that you eat shit instead of voting for the person that will actually fight for your values. Sorry the Democrats keep refusing to learn this lesson, but they are just as much to blame for Trump’s victory as the people who voted for him.

        Out of your options above, the camel might actually be the safest option. You’ll at least get some hydration out of it if you don’t cook it to shit.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          If you’re an hour away from dying from thirst, then a murky pond of water filled with bacteria, is better than a bucket of shit or camel piss.

          bacteria may kill you in days. But you will die of thirst in one hour.

          You completely missed the entire point of the exercise. If I make it any dumber, I’ll have to write it in crayon.

          You were so close though. Go enjoy your cup of sand.

          • Gorillazrule@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            That’s exactly the reason that people didn’t vote.

            There’s no civilization in sight.

            Your options are

            1. drink the pond water and get dysentery. Struggle to find help while you are slowed down by your illness and shit yourself to death.

            2. drink the bucket of shit. Same problem just much quicker

            3. drink the camel piss. It’s sterile, (edit: I stand corrected) and provides some hydration

            4. just fucking give up because all these choices are dire and no matter what you’re probably going to die because there is no sign of civilization or rescue, or another clean source of water, or things getting remotely better for you.

            And you’re yelling at people for not happily slurping up the pond water and subjecting themselves to dysentery. Some people are going to have the fortitude to do whatever it takes for survival. And some people in that situation just give up.

            People didn’t vote because of apathy, and no hope that things will get better in the future. Yes Harris is better than Trump. But she’s still a step in the wrong direction. Just because it wasn’t a running long jump towards doom doesn’t mean it’s not making progress in the same direction. You want people to vote for you? Inspire your fucking voter base. Give them something to rally behind. Make them excited. Give them hope. Give them a reason to stand in line for hours to vote after working an 8 hour day. Have strong policies that inspire confidence in your capabilities. Don’t make a large part of your campaign ‘at least I’m better than the other person’. That’s your selling point? Not how good you are. Just how less bad you are.

          • miak@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 days ago

            Lol, yeah, you’re right. My bad for assuming we would have to make the decision with information that a person would likely have in that scenario, like one has to do in real life… I think you’re still wrong, both in the example you attempted and the point you’re trying to make.
            Democrats will need to work on offering people something more than murky water that might kill you if they want to get people to come out and vote for them. And why would I risk a deadly bacterial infection when I have piss available that I am reasonably certain is sterile? I’m honestly not sure why you think that’s not a good course of action, though I’ll admit I’m not a scientist and would be interested to hear a scientist/doctor’s take on this survival scenario.

      • Aabbcc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 days ago

        You’ll jump through any hoop to say the voters should have drank more piss instead of saying the piss should have cleaned itself up

        I don’t just mean Gaza, I mean democratic candidates need to find a way to excite rural voters by giving them an actual path to financial stability

        Your parable doesn’t even make sense, the election wasn’t lost by educated people refusing to drink piss, it was won by republicans by getting uneducated voters to happily eat shit thinking it’ll give them super powers. (I mean educated on the issues like “what is a tarrif”)

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          Don’t get pissed dude.

          you’re not supposed to drink the camel piss. Hell, you weren’t even supposed to drink the bucket of shit!

          You should have drank the pond scum. Would have at least bought you a few days until you get some help for dysentery.

          But you decided to eat the sand. You poor dumb bastard, now you’re drier than turkey jerky.

          • Aabbcc@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 days ago

            Sorry I didn’t really read your story

            You should ask the pond to be less scummier

            Also I’m not American, and if I was you don’t know who I would have voted for

            You poor dumb bastard

            Cringe. There’s no other word for it. This makes me cringe. It’s cringe worthy.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    There’s a perverse bunch here on lemmy that are blaming the Democrat Party for their failure to vote. They justify it by essentially saying that because they weren’t catered to (being further left than centrist platform Harris ran) that it’s the democrat’s fault we got trump. That’s some republican-level victim shit. “We did the opposite of what we should and things didn’t get better!”

    No, motherfucker, you sat this one out in a battleground state so we got a fascist and that’s better than Harris? WTF kind of logic is that?

    • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      12 days ago

      They get to blame everyone and pretend to be smarter than other people because their third choice candidate can’t be wrong. This way they can blame the DNC for themselves not caring about all the groups trump will adversely effect and they can then also blame republicans when they eventually do it, all from the top of their high horse.

    • DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      Every. Single. Election. People. Blame. Voters. And. Nothing. Changes. Maybe it’s the lame ass corporate candidates that need to change. I voted Kamala, but it was fucking obvious as shit she didn’t stand a chance.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        The vote is the only thing we have control over.

        You think allowing a dictator to take the reins is gonna get you what you want? Really? Explain to everyone how sitting this one out, an election that may cement Republican power and place Democrats as a token but useless party fore the remainder of the foreseeable future, will fix what you see as wrong with the Democratic party?

        Any other election I might have agreed with you.

        But not this one.

        Own it.

        • DiagnosedADHD@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          I didn’t say that, I voted. I’ve just heard this same argument so many times through the years and it’s not working.

    • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      Sounds to me like she would of won with a more leftist policy. Sounds to me like the campaign failed to do the thing that would of won them the election.

      Like, I voted harris as a harm reduction vote, but I cannot be mad at people for refusing to vote for the party who abandoned them and everything they stand for on the hope that they (the voter) would back them regardless of running on pro Israel, pro border wall, half ass abortion and status quo when status quo is the thing everyone fucking hates right now.

      They went in with a bad gameplan and it didn’t pan out. Blame the fucking party for doing nothing.