• The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    7 days ago

    It makes me slightly uneasy and sad that this is done for big events, but I also understand why.

    I think the knowledge just saps some of the frivolity from what is otherwise a fun, low-stakes outing.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      126
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I kinda hate to be this guy, but:

      Know this does not exist in any other country

      It is unnecessary in any other country

      America has entirely constructed its own hell by simply not applying the same appropriate gun control you see in every other developed nation in the world

      Edit: and I know you probably agree with me, but goddamn you’ve just collectively proven as a nation that over half your countrymen will bazooka their feet and the feet of everyone unfortunate enough to be near them, before even contemplating the idea of supporting someone who promises to make their lives better!

        • itslilith
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          Every time you leave your house you have a chance to be hit by a car. It’s many orders of magnitude more likely than to get killed by a terrorist attack. Yet everyone still drives cars.

          The fear of terrorism has been used to curtail so many liberties. Always as a temporary measure. Draconian pre-flight security screenings? (seriously, not being allowed to bring water?): “temporary”. Expansion of the surveillance state and policing: “temporary”.

          It’s time to start asking wether this is all worth it. The fetishization of “security above all” in modern political rhetoric is a bad thing, in my opinion.